You don't offer much opine. You typically stick with data.
From your seat, does it seem the intention of social distancing and masking changed mid stream?
Yes, it did. Initially the idea was to flatten the curve so we didn't overwhelm the medical system. There was no doubt about that.
Our lack of testing, long incubation periods, high percentage of asymptomatic cases, etc. led us to falsely believe that this virus spread much, much faster than it actually does (don't get me wrong, this guy can spread - but we were seeing folks show up in hospitals so fast that at first it appeared that severe case spread was incredibly fast...and now we understand that differently). So, at that time, our only hope to keep from a mass-death situation was to flatten the curve once we realized we had a severe outbreak.
But, then we realized over time that this wasn't a US-wide outbreak....and that spread was much slower in some regions of the country - and overall slower than we thought from our initial testing ramp because there were actually a lot more cases walking around than we realized.
We were also getting more and more data from countries that seemed to be getting through their death wave and then seeing healthy case drop with quarantine.
I think this is when the narrative changed from flatten the curve to quash the virus. While some of that could be political (it is really difficult to say what the main driver is, IMO), some of it is simply because we then realized just how possible it was. Countries that strictly adhered to distancing were seeing numbers get low enough that active testing and contact tracing could then actually get a grip on the virus and keep things in decent check. We'll see if that continues to play out that way as they move back into winter, but it can be stamped out to some degree and not just tolerated with a flatten the curve mentality because the R0*%sympotomatic is just smaller than we realized.
So, now you have competing approaches state by state. Some areas are aiming at driving to zero, others just want to live with it and slow burn deaths, while trying to avoiding overwhelming systems (which in less populated areas appears to be quite possible even with fairly regular commerce). I'm worry with as much interstate commerce as we have that these various approaches are going to cause problems.