Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

You should really talk to some real physicians who are on the frontlines fighting this instead of thinking that google gives you great info.

So let's hear from some, instead of quoting Facebook posts from you neighbor's, brother-in-law's, dentist's cousin.

Let's see some real live faked death certificates to confirm the grand conspiracy involving the 3,000+ health departments in the United States.
 
Whichever Governors signed the orders to release felons from prison due to Covid....should meet this same fate. How stupid, exactly, are these people??

Girl Slaughtered After Her Alleged Rapist Was Released From Jail Over COVID Concerns - The Federalist

Despite objections from an Alexandria prosecutor and Virginia law that states those charged with certain violent crimes like rape are presumed to be a danger and not eligible for bond, Bouaichi’s lawyers successfully argued that he be released on a $25,000 bond.

You can thank recently retired judge Nolan Dawkins, who's friends want to name a street after him, for releasing him on bond in spite of Virginia law.
 
Despite objections from an Alexandria prosecutor and Virginia law that states those charged with certain violent crimes like rape are presumed to be a danger and not eligible for bond, Bouaichi’s lawyers successfully argued that he be released on a $25,000 bond.

You can thank recently retired judge Nolan Dawkins, who's friends want to name a street after him, for releasing him on bond in spite of Virginia law.
Northam said only those who didn't purpose a threat to society, couldn't be arrested for a violent crime and had less than 1 year left on their sentence were up for release. This judge bucked the system and went his own route.
 
Not sure why you are trying to peddle a false dichotomy(again), did the mayor of Chicago or someone else release a statement saying "it's safe to go back to rioting and looting"?
They're so quick to condemn religious gatherings, wedding's, parties, school or anything else but when it comes to riots they're radio silent
 
  • Like
Reactions: oz615
They're so quick to condemn religious gatherings, wedding's, parties, school or anything else but when it comes to riots they're radio silent

So you are contending that limiting social gatherings in the name of public health to retard the spread of a disease during a pandemic, is tantamount to the wholesale endorsement of the criminal acts of 'rioting' and 'looting'?
 
So you are contending that limiting social gatherings in the name of public health to retard the spread of a disease during a pandemic, is tantamount to the wholesale endorsement of the criminal acts of 'rioting' and 'looting'?
One set of actions is being enforced by law, while the other is having a blind eye turned towards it. But you wouldn't see this because it doesn't fit your narrative
 
So you are contending that limiting social gatherings in the name of public health to retard the spread of a disease during a pandemic, is tantamount to the wholesale endorsement of the criminal acts of 'rioting' and 'looting'?
Silence is compliance. If Chicago’s mayor can criticize a bunch of white people for playing peacefully along the lakeshore she can find time to say something about rioting and looting. Otherwise she comes off as a giant hypocrite.
 
Silence is compliance. If Chicago’s mayor can criticize a bunch of white people for playing peacefully along the lakeshore she can find time to say something about rioting and looting. Otherwise she comes off as a giant hypocrite.

I think the word you are looking for is "complicit".

Is that the case in all situations? So when cops are out shooting innocent people who've done nothing wrong, and politicians of your favored political party are silent, does that make them complicit?
 
You're playing dumb in an attempt to derail the conversation, it's cool I know being a grown up is hard for you

You've yet to show how looting and rioting occuring in Chicago is in any way connected to children being able to attend school or not due to covid 19; such a bizarre way to attempt to show your "adulthood".
 
I think the word you are looking for is "complicit".

Is that the case in all situations? So when cops are out shooting innocent people who've done nothing wrong, and politicians of your favored political party are silent, does that make them complicit?
Nice deflection, but we are talking specifically about the Mayor of Chicago.

And, I messed up, I’m pretty sure the quote I was going for was “silence is consent.”

Also, my favorite political party is pretty vocal about Police use of excessive force.
 
You've yet to show how looting and rioting occuring in Chicago is in any way connected to children being able to attend school or not due to covid 19; such a bizarre way to attempt to show your "adulthood".
The two are directly related during this "pandemic", one is cheered upon, allowed, called a movement while the other is condemned and said to kill millions. So which is it? Either all are bad or both are fine?

Further to your point about cops shooting innocent people, arent those cops prosecuted? I've yet to hear one person say George Floyd should have been killed, have you? That's allegedly the reasoning behind all these riots and protest. Further more, the shooting in Chicago last night was apparently justified.
 
Nice deflection, but we are talking specifically about the Mayor of Chicago.

And, I messed up, I’m pretty sure the quote I was going for was “silence is consent.”

Also, my favorite political party is pretty vocal about Police use of excessive force.

So again, is this in all cases, if a politician doesn't put out a Tweet condemning a criminal act, is that a tacit endorsement?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
The two are directly related during this "pandemic", one is cheered upon, allowed, called a movement while the other is condemned and said to kill millions. So which is it? Either all are bad or both are fine?

Further to your point about cops shooting innocent people, arent those cops prosecuted? I've yet to hear one person say George Floyd should have been killed, have you? That's allegedly the reasoning behind all these riots and protest. Further more, the shooting in Chicago last night was apparently justified.

Again, what does people rioting and looting have to do with whether or not sending kids back to school is going to contribute to the continued spread of covid 19?

And no, most cops never even face charges when involved in questionable shootings.

While it’s rare to see officers indicted for killing civilians, convictions are rarer. Of the 104 state and local law enforcement officers who have been arrested for murder or manslaughter for fatal on-duty shootings since 2005, 36 have been convicted of a crime, according to criminologist Philip Stinson, who was a police officer in New Hampshire in the 1980s. By comparison, of the 217 people charged with murder and manslaughter in the nation’s 75 largest counties in May 2009 alone, 70% were convicted of murder or other felonies, according to the most recent data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Even when officers are convicted, they’re often found guilty of lesser offenses and receive more lenient sentences than civilians convicted of the same crimes, according to researchers.
A cop shot and killed their mom, and these men want to know why he still hasn't faced trial
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger

VN Store



Back
Top