Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#116,653
#116,653
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, Orangeburst and allvol123
#116,656
#116,656
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77 and Orangeburst
#116,657
#116,657
allvol123 said:
Coming after the decent people. Public education in this country has no chance. Home school, private school, whatever….but get the F out of public schools.
Click to expand...
Jennifer Owens is behind this latest move along with KCS Pass. She’s a vile piece of crap.

I have a feeling the people behind this nonsense in Knoxville are getting worried about outside council getting on board. This reeks of desperation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, Rickyvol77 and Orangeburst
#116,660
#116,660
evillawyer said:
The horse paste junkies are not gonna be pleased.
Efficacy of Ivermectin on Disease Progression in Patients With COVID-19
Click to expand...
Did you read the results? If they are being consistent and the ivermetcin group is always listed first there is a pretty significant difference.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/ja...tent=tfl&utm_term=021822#related-articles-tab
"Results Among 490 patients included in the primary analysis (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.7] years; 267 women [54.5%]), 52 of 241 patients (21.6%) in the ivermectin group and 43 of 249 patients (17.3%) in the control group progressed to severe disease (relative risk [RR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.87-1.80; P = .25). For all prespecified secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 4 (1.7%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.30; P = .17), intensive care unit admission in 6 (2.4%) vs 8 (3.2%) (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.27-2.20; P = .79), and 28-day in-hospital death in 3 (1.2%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.11; P = .09). The most common adverse event reported was diarrhea (14 [5.8%] in the ivermectin group and 4 [1.6%] in the control group)."

1. Doesnt help with severe disease, they did quiet a bit worse. 52 vs 43. But considering the break downs below I am wondering what they are calling severe.
2. Ventilation. 4 vs 10, a 60% reduction is pretty significant. Especially if you consider that's 4 of 52 (7%) vs 10 of 43 (23%).
3. ICU admittance 6 vs 8, again that's 6 out 52, 11%, vs 8 out 43, 18% in the control.
4. Deaths 3 vs 10, a 70% decrease in deaths is nothing? And again that is 3 out of 52 (5%), vs 10 out of 43 (23%)
5. More diaherea if you took ivermetcin. 14 vs 4

This is another case of the results not appearing to line up with their summary. More got severely sick, but fewer died, ended up on vents, or in the ICU because of ivermectin. Again what do they mean by severe disease if its not those three things?

Does anyone else read these results and get something different? Am I reading the results backwards? I reread multiple times and i came up heads each time.

This is why i dont trust the "science" the results dont seem to line up with the conclusions they draw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321 and InVOLuntary
#116,664
#116,664
SamRebel35 said:
That's nothing! That's barely two football stadiums worth of people!
Click to expand...
I really want someone else to read the results and tell me I am wrong. I have always been in the skeptical crowd, but seeing results like this get dismissed makes me lean towards this is on purpose.

I want someone to point out how I am wrong or crazy with my understanding of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#116,666
#116,666
allvol123 said:
Until people stand up the public schools are effed. They will make it unattractive for any decent person to want to serve on the school board.
Click to expand...

The consequences of the COVID power grab will still be lingering around in a decade. It’s not about health and not about science. A lot of bad people got a taste of power and control, and they are really liking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky_Top_Vol13, mr.checkerboards, davethevol and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top