Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#117,704
#117,704
85SugarVol said:
Do you have a link for that ?
Click to expand...


Look up the side effects of Remdeziver.

Back pain
chest tightness
chills
cough
dark-colored urine
difficulty swallowing
fast heartbeat
fever
flushing
headache
hives, itching
light-colored stools
nausea and vomiting
puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue
stomach pain, continuing
trouble breathing
unusual tiredness or weakness
yellow eyes or skin
Less common

Seizures
skin rash

In what world does it make sense to prescribe a drug thats known to cause difficulty breathing for a respiratory virus
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards, Rasputin_Vol and Ttucke11
#117,705
#117,705
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol and 85SugarVol
#117,706
#117,706
Ttucke11 said:
Hard to find because they hate admitting they killed people, but here is the WHO advising not to use it early on because it doesn't help at all.

Remdesivir shouldn't be used on hospitalized Covid-19 patients, WHO advises

A lot of studies show that it causes acute kidney failure, breathing issues, and is a fairly dangerous drug. Maybe one of our medical experts can chime in. I'm a little bogged down atm.
Click to expand...
It slugs your kidneys. Then that opens you up to a myriad of other problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards, 0nelilreb, Rasputin_Vol and 1 other person
#117,707
#117,707
A new article just came out about this. Here's what stood out (bolded by me):

Bloom’s paper was the product of detective work he’d undertaken after noticing that a number of early SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences mentioned in a published paper from China had somehow vanished without a trace. The sequences, which map the nucleotides that give a virus its unique genetic identity, are key to tracking when the virus emerged and how it might have evolved. In Bloom’s view, their disappearance raised the possibility that the Chinese government might be trying to hide evidence about the pandemic’s early spread. Piecing together clues, Bloom established that the NIH itself had deleted the sequences from its own archive at the request of researchers in Wuhan. Now, he was hoping Fauci and his boss, NIH director Francis Collins, could help him identify other deleted sequences that might shed light on the mystery.
Click to expand...


And Fauci and a small group of scientists, including Andersen and Garry, worked to enshrine the natural-origin theory during confidential discussions in early February 2020, even though several of them privately expressed that they felt a lab-related incident was likelier.
Click to expand...

Why top scientists linked arms to tamp down public speculation about a lab leak—even when their emails, revealed via FOIA requests and congressional review, suggest they held similar concerns—remains unclear...The effort to close the debate in favor of the natural-origin hypothesis continues today. In February, The New York Times gave front-page treatment to a set of preprints—written by Michael Worobey at the University of Arizona, Kristian Andersen at Scripps Research Institute, and 16 coauthors, including Garry—claiming that a new analysis of public data from the Huanan market in Wuhan provided “dispositive evidence” that the virus first leapt to humans from animals sold there. But a number of top scientists, Bloom among them, questioned that assertion, saying the preprints, while worthy, relied on incomplete data and found no infected animal.
Click to expand...

And unique features of the virus led some of the world's top virologists, including those associated with Fauci, to raise the possibility that it was laboratory-engineered.
Click to expand...

This is where Fauci is in trouble:

Redfield questioned whether scientists in Wuhan had gone on to carry out gain-of-function experiments on their own, at a laboratory with insufficient security and little international oversight. Could that be where COVID-19 came from?

According to Vanity Fair, Redfield brought his concerns to Fauci in mid-January 2020. He also shared them with Jeremy Farrar, the director of the U.K. mega-charity Wellcome Trust, and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization (WHO). His message was: “We had to take the lab-leak hypothesis with extreme seriousness.”

What happened next is scandalous. A Freedom of Information Act request by BuzzFeed News revealed that on February 1, 2020, at 12:30 a.m., Fauci emailed NIAID principal deputy director Hugh Auchincloss a copy of the 2015 gain-of-function study and wrote, "Hugh: It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on." He told Auchincloss to read the paper and wrote, "You will have tasks today that must be done."

Later that day, Farrar organized a conference call with 11 top international virologists including Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins to discuss what was known about the virus. Astonishingly, Redfield was excluded from the call. According to Vanity Fair, he was not even told it was happening. The person in charge of the agency leading the U.S. government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was kept out of discussions about the origins of the virus after asking Fauci and Farrar to seriously investigate all the possibilities.
Click to expand...

Why exclude Redfield? Funny how some scientists flipped their position after the call:

The conference call was held "in total confidence," and the details of the discussion remain shrouded in secrecy. What is known is that before the call, some of the participants, such as Dr. Kristian Andersen, a virologist at Scripps Research, had noted that some features of SARS-CoV-2 "(potentially) look engineered." Andersen told Fauci in an email that several experts who had analyzed the virus "find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

But after the call, those involved would condemn the lab-leak hypothesis and those advancing it. Within three days, four of the scientists who raised the possibility of a laboratory origin for COVID-19 signed on to a draft letter declaring that “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.” That letter, titled, "The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2," was published in the journal Nature Medicine on March 17. National media outlets seized on the statement, inaccurately referring to it as a "study" that purportedly debunked the lab-leak theory.
Click to expand...

About that deleted data:

Bloom told Vanity Fair that he took his preprint paper to Fauci for review because it contained sensitive revelations about the NIH, given that the agency ran the database from which the viral sequences went missing. Bloom realized that the NIH itself had deleted the data, at the request of Chinese researchers at the Wuhan institute, and he wanted Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins to help him find other missing data that could shine a light on the origins of COVID-19.
Click to expand...

“This Shouldn’t Happen”: Inside the Virus-Hunting Nonprofit at the Center of the Lab-Leak Controversy

This is what a cover-up looks like. Cover-ups happen for a reason. Thanks to this and the Chinese we'll likely never know for sure what exactly happen but it appears that there was a cover up and the most likely reason is because it did indeed come from the lab
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky_Top_Vol13 and davethevol
#117,708
#117,708
I'm definitely not a medical expert but here is Dr Bryan Ardis with a compelling argument against Remdeziver. I believe he was one of the first to blow the whistle on this.

In New York, 26.9% of Medicare-Aged Patients Who Received Fauci's 5-Day Remdesivir Protocol Died

Dr. Bryan Ardis: "[Remdesivir] actually causes death of heart cells and is cardiotoxic and can lead to cardiac arrest."
"Guess what the only authorized drug to treat COVID-19 children is now? In hospitals and outside. Remdesivir."
 
#117,722
#117,722
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and allvol123
#117,725
#117,725
Ttucke11 said:
Hard to find because they hate admitting they killed people, but here is the WHO advising not to use it early on because it doesn't help at all.

Remdesivir shouldn't be used on hospitalized Covid-19 patients, WHO advises

A lot of studies show that it causes acute kidney failure, breathing issues, and is a fairly dangerous drug. Maybe one of our medical experts can chime in. I'm a little bogged down atm.
Click to expand...
Saw acute kidney injury with most remdesivir pts. Then again by the time they get to ICU with covid they have multi organ dysfunction. Kidney, liver, lungs and heart all from low flow states and hypoxia.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top