Gramps
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,143
- Likes
- 6,310
McCaskill, who is trailing Akin in the polls, said that Republican leaders should not be trying to overturn the results of the Republican primary that made Akin their candidate.
"Elections are sacred," McCaskill told St. Louis Fox affiliate KTVS. "There was an election, so I think the voters of Missouri should be respected, not have some big-wig, fancy people from Washington come in here and threaten him that he's got to drop out."
Even as Mitt Romney sought to quash the furor surrounding Todd Akins legitimate rape comments, the Republican platform committee here approved an abortion plank that includes no exemptions for rape, incest or even to save the life of the mother.
The platform committee instead approved draft language Tuesday, calling for a Human Life Amendment that gives legal protection to the unborn. Democrats quickly labeled the GOP language the Akin Plank, referring to the Missouri Senate candidates statements that victims of legitimate rape rarely get pregnant.
:sigh:
OK, I've waited long enough and nobody seems to be looking at the big picture in this situation.
How many abortions in this country are performed because they are the after effects of a rape? 10%? 5%? 1%?
I would say closer to 1%, but let's play around and say the number of abortions due to rapes is 10%. :unsure:
You have the GOP continually falling for the trap that liberals create where they argue and defend the minority of cases when in reality, over 90% of abortions performed are because of women not being able to keep their legs closed or not have unprotected sex.
Their body. Their choice. Someone else has to suffer the consequences, though.
You all have just skated over the big picture and instead have allowed yourselves to be suckered into situation where you have party platforms built around a 10% exception to the rule. You all are getting bogged down on what was obviously a poorly worded (or not politically tactful) sound bite. Even if you eliminate the exception, you're still gonna have a million abortions occurring. So what are we arguing about here?
So we are gonna run pols out of office for saying something (borderline, imo) stupid?
Whatever, Ras. Dude said something really stupid relative to the abilities of the human reproductive system. Lots of folks said "Hey look, that dude said something really stupid!"
If your running for Senator and you say something really stupid, people are gonna notice. They did.
I don't see the drama, but maybe you do.
:sigh:
OK, I've waited long enough and nobody seems to be looking at the big picture in this situation.
How many abortions in this country are performed because they are the after effects of a rape? 10%? 5%? 1%?
I would say closer to 1%, but let's play around and say the number of abortions due to rapes is 10%. :unsure:
You have the GOP continually falling for the trap that liberals create where they argue and defend the minority of cases when in reality, over 90% of abortions performed are because of women not being able to keep their legs closed or not have unprotected sex.
Their body. Their choice. Someone else has to suffer the consequences, though.
You all have just skated over the big picture and instead have allowed yourselves to be suckered into situation where you have party platforms built around a 10% exception to the rule. You all are getting bogged down on what was obviously a poorly worded (or not politically tactful) sound bite. Even if you eliminate the exception, you're still gonna have a million abortions occurring. So what are we arguing about here?
It's tantamount to these hippies and legalize weed guys that go around demagoging the issue by saying we need to legalize reefer to save cancer patients? Really? How many of these weed smokers are cancer patients vs how many are just using it for recreational use?
Yet, whenever the discussion of weed comes up, we have both sides arguing over if Granny can get her joints legalized or else she will die in a nursing home.
Oh, wrong word.
I don't see the arguing. You said "So what are we arguing about here?". Who's arguing?
Dude said something really stupid, everybody knows it, no argument.
1) It's not even in the same ballpark as the same argument.
Proportionally, if you counted the number of smokers that are cancer patients and compared it to the number smokers that are recreational, it would be on par with the number of women that had an abortion due to rape vs women who had one just as a lazy form of birth control.