BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
I am a HUGE fan of personal responsibility. But I am not unrealistic.
First, it is easy for a white guy making a good living, who comes from a nice middle class family, to bemoan the fact that so many others just can't seem to do what I have obviously done. Why can't they make the same personal sacrifices I had to make, such as studying in the dorms on a Friday night?
.
I'm actually for the abolishment of the Department of Education because education is like healthcare, a states issue per the 10th Amendment.
Most people who feel a sense of entitlement are too lazy to work for it. It's the easy way out, blame someone else for your shortcomings. Too bad we have a government who now caters to this way of thinking.
even those who grew up wealthy statistically there is an excellent chance their parents grew up poor. this theory of multiple generations of wealth just doesn't pan out with reality. why do some people get out of it and others don't? hard work? intelligence? probably. but let's not act like the poor are dooming their children to poverty and there is no way out because that is garbage.
I don't think there is anything I could say which would persuade people who think the way you do that there might be some merit to any federal program that isn's about blowing something up.
Not every single one from a middle class family succeeds, and not every one from a poor family fails.
But you cannot seriously be arguing that your starting point in life doesn't give you a leg up, or down, as the case may be.
Everyone has personal stories of people they know that screwed up a good shot or did really well considering adverse circumstances. But those are individual cases. If yuou look at the overall picture, there is no way on Earth anyone can claim that such background is irrelevant.
But of course then out trot the Cartervols types and their "inherently lazy" critique... Just so ignorant, and I maintain, intentionally so.
I don't think you'll find very many who are against federal programs that lend a hand up for those in need. What they do not agree with is subsidizing someones entire life because they are content with what they get for nothing on the taxpayers dime.
Not every single one from a middle class family succeeds, and not every one from a poor family fails.
But you cannot seriously be arguing that your starting point in life doesn't give you a leg up, or down, as the case may be.
Everyone has personal stories of people they know that screwed up a good shot or did really well considering adverse circumstances. But those are individual cases. If yuou look at the overall picture, there is no way on Earth anyone can claim that such background is irrelevant.
But of course then out trot the Cartervols types and their "inherently lazy" critique... Just so ignorant, and I maintain, intentionally so.
You can't have entitlements without changing the level of dependence in the culture.
My dad was out of work for 2 weeks due to a strike where he worked. He and his buddy got a job caddying until regular work resumed.
Now we see people unemployed who wait for the right job and live off the abundant federal and state programs.
Now we see people unemployed who wait for the right job and live off the abundant federal and state programs.
Current unemployment benefits stretch to 99 weeks I believe - almost 2 years! Economists recognize that the continued expansion of unemployment benefits are keeping the unemployment rate high.
So what on earth makes you think that government intervention is going to change the disparity in environmental backgrounds?
You can discount personal responsibility all you'd like, but we bit know that there are people who would choose governmental largesse as a lifestyle and those who would prefer to live in dumpster to avoid it. That isn't going to change, no matter how long you pretend environment ruins people. Human nature isn't new and isn't changing. Piss away your own money fighting the windmills ad stop arguing to piss away mine.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You can't have entitlements without changing the level of dependence in the culture.
My dad was out of work for 2 weeks due to a strike where he worked. He and his buddy got a job caddying until regular work resumed. (1950s)
Now we see people unemployed who wait for the right job and live off the abundant federal and state programs.
Current unemployment benefits stretch to 99 weeks I believe - almost 2 years! Economists recognize that the continued expansion of unemployment benefits are keeping the unemployment rate high.
my first teaching year i got axed due to the budget cuts that came down that year and consolidation of programs. I took a job working at Rite Aid as a loss prevention agent for neary a year
I completely agree that we have way too many people who would take that approach to life. I happen to believe a lot of that has to do with education issues, but in the end I do wish that we spent more money dealing with that problem so as not to allow the cycle to repeat as opposed to mere continuation of minimal subsistence that guarantees more demand for government handouts as time wears on.
I'll violate my own caution about using singular examples. I have a friend who has been on unemployment for more than two years. Looks for work only very occassionally at this point (he's in banking, in Florida, which is right now sort of pointless). He's a friend, but I consider him to be a bit of a scoundrel in this regard.
You do what you got to do.
I don't think there is anything I could say which would persuade people who think the way you do that there might be some merit to any federal program that isn's about blowing something up.