IPorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 25,545
- Likes
- 47
You are going to judge those by the labels placed on them by a partisan commission hoisting them up purely for the political purpose of making it seem like its Democrats who overspend?
All under the complete ruse that its just being responsible with tax dollars?
While at the same time decrying the efforts of one of their own to cut LITERALLY FIFTY TIMES what these people have come up with on the social spending side?
Really?
Tell you what. It is astounding to me the level of superficiality in your view of this process.
Grow up.
The last time I checked cable, satellite and broadcast television were publicly available. There are many channels on television devoted to being educational as well.
Cable and satellite are paid subscription, not public broadcasting. Those educational channels first require that paid subscription.
PBS is OTA. Unplug your TV from your cable box, pop on an antenna (now you need a digital converter, I believe) and you can get PBS. Tell me how many educational channels you get, other than PBS.
To save you the hassle, this is a Wiki list of major OTA stations:
PBS, NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, The CW, MyNetworkTV, Ion Television
Which are educational?
I did perform a search on the percentage of households who have subscriber TV and I found numbers from 80% to 91%. I would assume that households who have no television whatsoever is probably about the same who only get OTA.
My point, not that many people use it and I really don't think anyone actually needs it.
Ya the DoD really needs to be cut. I forget the figures but the vast majority of our budget is evenly cut between social programs and defense. I'm all for peace through strength but, it is beyond ridiculous. Remember, it's still a gov't program and thus largely inefficient as well. The other thing is... 2.5 trillion over TEN YEARS??? Really are kidding me? You saved us 250 billion a year. A start but hardly anything to pant about when we are in the red by five times that amount.
Disappointed that the GOP doesn't have the balls to cut waste from the DoD. Its a decent enough first draft, though.
sorry but times are tough and we got to tighten our belts
Fire up the oven and bake some more cookies
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to announce as early as Thursday about $100 billion in savings for the Pentagon and cuts to some weapons programs, sources said on Monday.
Defense News, a trade publication, reported in December that the White House Office of Management and Budget had ordered the Pentagon to cut its budget by $90 billion over the next five years, beginning with a $12 billion cut in fiscal 2012.
The Pentagon's fiscal 2011 budget plan had called for a spending of $549 billion in 2011, growing to $566 billion in 2012, excluding war spending.
Modest 10%. Please.
I'm for it if we do it across the board and we hammer silliness like endowment for the arts and school bands and union ruined education. When you're talking about cutting defense spending, it's senseless to pretend that something else should be salvaged.
And, eff the freaking band. It's the band.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
School bands are the bomb. I am for a completely overhaul of education, but school bands actually provide a lifetime of rewards for kids. One of the best programs in our current school system. Gives them an actual / life-affirming skill in the real world unlike the standardized testing regime.
indeed, because everybody knows that when an employer sees that little Susie played 2nd Clarinet her senior year, or that Charlie was a master of the triangle by 8th grade, that both would be fantastic candidates for the open position in the neurosurgery department.
and I think that's where we have an issue. Most see band as an activity and not a class. You can easily learn an instrument on your own dime
indeed, because everybody knows that when an employer sees that little Susie played 2nd Clarinet her senior year, or that Charlie was a master of the triangle by 8th grade, that both would be fantastic candidates for the open position in the neurosurgery department.
This is just the capitulation to Homo economicus. It is one of the saddest statements I think I've seen in a long while, I've got to say. I think this rigid definition of a human being is the source of many of our problems.
I bet a large proportion of neurosurgeons have extended experience with music. I wonder if we can find data. :search:
This is just the capitulation to Homo economicus. It is one of the saddest statements I think I've seen in a long while, I've got to say. I think this rigid definition of a human being is the source of many of our problems.
I bet a large proportion of neurosurgeons have extended experience with music. I wonder if we can find data. :search:
50%? We don't have the luxury of being Eurovaginas who have someone to fight their battles. Being a douche using little sister isn't how we roll.
As to your band comments, at least I know why the vagisil approach works for you.
Posted via VolNation Mobile