lyansaine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 120
- Likes
- 54
They suggest that teams tend to do well when you have two NBA All-Star big men BOTH decide to stay for three years.
Nobody's asking for a uniformed opinion. It's the endless bantering about extremes that is relentlessly continued.
You guys keep saying the pearl lovers never show up. I've been here. Was here last night, I respond when called out. Can't speak for the rest of them, but at least 1 shows up. I hope CM keeps proving me wrong, and I'm getting ready for my apology thread.
That's still more than a couple. The original argument was that only a couple of posters have been saying fire Martin. That's utter horsesh*t. I can rattle off more than 2 easily.
So, Donovan receives no credit for this, or were they successful in spite of his average coaching ability? Who recruited those players? Who taught and coached those players for three years? Also, simply having a lot of talent doesn't always translate to success, let alone back-to-back titles.
Those two All-Star forwards weren't exactly slam dunk prospects coming out of high school either.
He's lucky that those two players were both rich enough to turn down guaranteed NBA contracts when 99.9% of players would have made the opposite decision. Guess what happens if that's true for Anthony Davis? MKG? Wall?
We have owned Donovan for a while now, and part of that is because he's easily the most overrated coach in the nation. I don't say that to take anything away from Martin, though, as I think he's done a fantastic job (aside from leaving McBee on Marshall Henderson all game long).
It was just as bad on the other side of the fence in the off season....Zo couldn't blow his nose without someone posting on here about how good he did it and how proud they was that he was our coach....it got pretty nauseating.
You don't actually think any of the usual Debbie's are gonna show up do you?
He's lucky that those two players were both rich enough to turn down guaranteed NBA contracts when 99.9% of players would have made the opposite decision. Guess what happens if that's true for Anthony Davis? MKG? Wall?
And the people who know the game and follow it didn't react like 12 year old girls either. They questioned some of the tactics used, but wasn't calling for him to be fired.
Everything isn't as black and white as they want to make it. It took the team awhile to figure out how to play without Maymon. Stokes hadn't even played a full season and had to adjust to double teams. Golden had been injured and he was not nearly as confident as he was last year. Once he got healthy, UT started their 6 game winning streak.
UT has had only one truly bad loss on their resume, but you would think they had lost to a number of bad teams based on the venom spewed by the Miserables. Again, the Legion of the Miserables usually have no damn clue what the hell they are watching and have zero experience teaching the game to even give a smidgen of meaningful advice. Every loss had the same morons coming in saying Martin should be fired. Now they've won 6 straight and they're nowhere to be found. F'n pathetic. They would rather hope UT and Martin fail instead of swallowing their pride and admitting they were wrong.
You said the same thing last year and we had to lose ten games "before the players would buy into his system" this year so kma.