I imagine the best insurance we have to get back eventually, if Heupel stays for awhile is to pass Nebraska. We're currently 45 games behind them and that would put us at 56. I don't see that program ever returning to prominence so that ground can be made up. We are currently tied with Southern Cal (which would become 11 back) and 1 game behind Georgia (which would become 12 back) however both of those programs are in pretty good shape right now ,so at best we'll be jockeying around with them in basically the same spot for a decade or more. It's probably more likely all 3 of us pass Nebraska by then than it is we pull way ahead of Southern Cal or Georgia again.
I think we can catch back up with USCw. It might take 10 or 20 years, but we can, knock on wood, average a delta of 1 game per season on them. I mean, if we're going (average) 11.5-2.5 over the next two decades, which seems pretty reasonable, and they're only getting 10-3 each year*, then we will catch them.
UGa, I agree, that's a harder path. Just staying even enough to not lose MORE ground will be our challenge concerning the Dawgs. For the forseeable future, anyway.
Nebraska, I agree. They're the other "easy" target. Will still take decades, you don't make up a 50-game deficit quickly. Even if we're doing the 11.5/season thing, all they have to do to keep us at bay for a decade is go 7-5 or 7-6 over and over. Even weakened, they can do that.
Go Vols!
* USCw has only had 4 seasons with 10 or better wins in the past decade. Their average win rate over that time is 8 games. I hear you, they didn't have Lincoln Riley in charge for most of that. You're right. But they also weren't in the B10 playing Mich, Mich St, Ohio St, and Penn State before, either. Lincoln buoys them up, but meanwhile the higher level of competition drags them back down. They could absolutely average 10 or fewer wins/year over the next 10-20 years. We just have to do our part and win 11 or more. Heh.