TrueOrange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 52,011
- Likes
- 7,266
The death penatly would hurt the university's pockets for sure, but the fans, players and other coaches who had nothing to do with it would end paying the price for the sins of the former regime. That is what sucks about that kind of punishment. That is why no one should ever be allowed to have that much power and control. It usually ends up ending badly.
I'll add that I only suggest the Death Penalty from an emotional standpoint. Legally, the Athletic Dept, namely the Football program, will most likely not be punished by the NCAA. That may be hard to fathom for some, but legally speaking, I'm most certain thats the right call.
You think NCAA will decide not to punish or you think NCAA does not have legal ability to punish? If the latter, why not?
The criminal in this matter has already been prosecuted and sentenced. The remiander of those responsible for the cover up of this have either been dismissed from the University or deceased. One in particular is both.
The matter as far as the legal process has been resolved. The Athletic Dept should not suffer any sanctions.
Not that it lessens the severity of this mushroom cloud, but the court of public opinon will punish that football program. The NCAA does not have any further jurisdiction on the matter and rightfully so.
Its time for the new regime to move forward as best they can.
It's a tough one.
Give them the death penalty. If the kids want to stay at Penn State, they get to keep their schollies. If not, they can transfer to another and play immediately. I think that's fair.
This. Not only that, but everybody else in the Big Ten would pay the price for losing that game, holders of TV rights, so on and so forth.The death penatly would hurt the university's pockets for sure, but the fans, players and other coaches who had nothing to do with it would end paying the price for the sins of the former regime. That is what sucks about that kind of punishment. That is why no one should ever be allowed to have that much power and control. It usually ends up ending badly.
This is how I see it. Also kinda plays in with my view that NCAA penalties should punish guilty parties, not the programs and universities with which they were associated. Too many times have coaches, players and administrators paid the price for the wrongdoings of others who walk away (not in this particular case, but you get the idea).The criminal in this matter has already been prosecuted and sentenced. The remiander of those responsible for the cover up of this have either been dismissed from the University or deceased. One in particular is both.
The matter as far as the legal process has been resolved. The Athletic Dept should not suffer any sanctions.
Not that it lessens the severity of this mushroom cloud, but the court of public opinon will punish that football program. The NCAA does not have any further jurisdiction on the matter and rightfully so.
Its time for the new regime to move forward as best they can.
The criminal in this matter has already been prosecuted and sentenced. The remiander of those responsible for the cover up of this have either been dismissed from the University or deceased. One in particular is both.
The matter as far as the legal process has been resolved. The Athletic Dept should not suffer any sanctions.
Not that it lessens the severity of this mushroom cloud, but the court of public opinon will punish that football program. The NCAA does not have any further jurisdiction on the matter and rightfully so.
Its time for the new regime to move forward as best they can.
This. Not only that, but everybody else in the Big Ten would pay the price for losing that game, holders of TV rights, so on and so forth.
This is how I see it. Also kinda plays in with my view that NCAA penalties should punish guilty parties, not the programs and universities with which they were associated. Too many times have coaches, players and administrators paid the price for the wrongdoings of others who walk away (not in this particular case, but you get the idea).
Idont think they have a choice to rule or not to rule against them any further. They govern college athletics, not the State of P.A.
It was a state matter that occured on a campus. Campus authorities addressed the matter as did the state prosecuters.
The NCAA legally has no further say in the matter.
They're pretty powerful, but they need not be considered on the same level as a State Governing body.
Idont think they have a choice to rule or not to rule against them any further. They govern college athletics, not the State of P.A.
It was a state matter that occured on a campus. Campus authorities addressed the matter as did the state prosecuters.
The NCAA legally has no further say in the matter.
They're pretty powerful, but they need not be considered on the same level as a State Governing body.
Thanks for the explanation, but I completely disagree. the NCAA has and should have the right to punish a member institution for covering widespread corruption and fostering an environment that allowed known criminal activity to continue. The athletic department harbored a known serial child rapist and allowed him to continue to use their facilities to rape additional boys. How can they not be punished?
No, the Athletic Department didn't.Thanks for the explanation, but I completely disagree. the NCAA has and should have the right to punish a member institution for covering widespread corruption and fostering an environment that allowed known criminal activity to continue. The athletic department harbored a known serial child rapist and allowed him to continue to use their facilities to rape additional boys. How can they not be punished?
The death penalty or additional sanctions at this point would do 100% of the harm solely to people who had no involvement in this issue whatsoever, and have zero effect on the people who are actually guilty, as every single one of them are no longer affiliated with Penn State.
Well... That's up to them, it's in extremely poor taste, but it's their school.Agree.
And it's these same people who did nothing to cover up for Sandusky that should expunge Paterno's name from their program. They did nothing, but continuing to honor a man who covered up for a pedophile is unacceptable.
Additionally, IMO, I don't think the NCAA should have anything to do with criminal justice... This is why we have a criminal justice system to begin with. If the issue doesn't concern academics or competition, then the 'AA shouldn't be concerned with it.
I see where you're coming from, but again, this was entirely a criminal matter where the guilty parties happened to work for a particular university.How does it not concern both academics and competition when the President, AD, head coach, and many others were all involved in the cover up. Don't you think a child abuse scandal would be much worse to PSU than recruiting violations. That is why they covered it up. They did not want it to tarnish their university or football program. As a result, no telling how many additional children were sexually assaulted.
I just don't understand how people can say, lets just let PSU go on there merry way like nothing ever happened. If this happened at UT, you can guarantee I would never step foot in Neyland Stadium again unless the school itself imposed a multi-year ban. Even then, I do not know if I would ever be able to cheer for my alma mater again.