carlos86
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,776
- Likes
- 6,986
Yeah I did. I even read the released version of the definition email... that came out weeks after the original engagement letter and one week after the Manafort raid so they could cover there asses after that over reach.
Here are the original letter defining points.
Nothing related to this trial is related to Russia collusion. And the matters related to the indictments were not discovered as a matter of this investigation. They were known years prior. And the last sentence let’s them say “go nuts with whatever you can find!”
This damn fiasco is the very definition of prosecutorial over reach and nothing in this damn trial relates to the original reason for investigation.
Fine. Game on. When we finally get another Dim in as POTUS we’ll already have our special prosecutor engagement letter drafted. We’ll just leave article i as a blank line and fill in as required. The other two are good as written.
So far 3 Federal Judges say that you are wrong and that Mueller is well within his authority.
"The Special Counsel’s appointment was consistent with both constitutional requirements regarding appointment of officers and statutory requirements governing the authority to conduct criminal litigation on behalf of the United States, the Special Counsel had legal authority to investigate and to prosecute this matter and dismissal of the Superseding Indictment is not warranted,"
“The scope of the special counsel’s power falls well within the boundaries the Constitution permits as the special counsel is supervised by an official who is himself accountable to the elected president,”