(utvolpj @ Aug 2 said:Gotta love the holier-than-thou attitude of a gator on a Vol board talking about guns. Not the glass house!!!
(Arclight @ Aug 2 said:Law Gator:
I want you think about what the alleged police caller said. Try and think like a cop--- a little.![]()
Consider this:
1. One player gets a 502 and is dismissed from the team.
2. Another player gets "involved to whatever length" with an officer. Perhaps, he points a weapon at him. He gets a four-game suspension and not dismissed.
3. CPF said Johnson was punished because he "disobeyed me" (Coach Fulmer). CPF said he "failed to walk away from ANY incident as I (CPF)had warned the entire team at the beginning of the season".
Supposition:
CPF knows more facts than we do as he should. Therefore, Johnson's punishment was less than Smith's because he (CPF) knows more than has been currently released. If Johnson had pointed the weapon at the game warden then one's guess is he'd probably be dismissed. The punishment of Johnson appears to fit his involvement.
(hvwarrior58 @ Aug 2 said:To be honest, I can't remember but I do know that he got in some trouble but faced no punishment. The same thing went for Riley Cooper putting his fist through someone's car window.
(vol_freak @ Aug 3 said:I still really don't get this whole Johnson scenario.
I don't know much about law enforcement besides what I see on television but it seems to me that this would have been handled much differently if the officer really did see them point a gun at him.
The officer states that after they waived "what appeared to be a gun" at him. At that point he said that he tried to get them to pull over before calling for backup. Is that typical protocol? I would think that an officer saw an automatic weapon and felt threatened would have immediately called for immediate and heavy backup. I mean these kids just pointed an automatic weapon at them, it's not like they just rolled through a stop sign.
Then when the cop did pull them over they had time to ask questions and "later" found the gun? It seems like they would have immediatly searched the car before interrogating the players.
Maybe I am reading too much into this.
(vol_freak @ Aug 3 said:I still really don't get this whole Johnson scenario.
I don't know much about law enforcement besides what I see on television but it seems to me that this would have been handled much differently if the officer really did see them point a gun at him.
The officer states that after they waived "what appeared to be a gun" at him. At that point he said that he tried to get them to pull over before calling for backup. Is that typical protocol? I would think that an officer saw an automatic weapon and felt threatened would have immediately called for immediate and heavy backup. I mean these kids just pointed an automatic weapon at them, it's not like they just rolled through a stop sign.
Then when the cop did pull them over they had time to ask questions and "later" found the gun? It seems like they would have immediatly searched the car before interrogating the players.
Maybe I am reading too much into this.
(Arclight @ Aug 3 said:LG:
My take on this incident is that CPF knows EXACTLY what happened. I think there has already been a little pre-court "plea bargaining" between the university and Tennessee Wildlife Resources. That is why CPF gave Johnson his punishment Weds when he had previously said he would wait till after any legal proceedings.
I have no knowledge or evidence to indicate that MJ pointed a pellet gun at the officer. I do think if he did admit pointing the pellet gun at the officer, CPF would have dismissed him.
It will definately be interesting to see how the incident "washes out".