onevolfan
Itsgr82batnvol!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
- Messages
- 5,792
- Likes
- 16
I just meant in that her salary skyrocketted when he started getting raises and that was only to match what he was making w/out any other justifiable reason.
As for any other reason, no, they don't.
Couple of weeks ago, Dearstone was giving Jeff(?) grief about liking so many different teams. In listing teams he followed, Jeff mentioned something about the Hartford Whalers. The following ensued (as close to verbatim as I can recall):
Dearstone: the Whalers?! How do you like the Whalers?!
Jeff: I liked them since they were (insert NHL team that I cannot recall here).
Dearstone: See, I don't like that, either.
Jeff: What?
Dearstone: When a team moves but keeps its former nickname that has nothing to do with new city - because it doesn't apply anymore. Like the Jazz in Utah.
Jeff: But Hartford is on the Atlantic Ocean...
Dearstone (interrupting): That's my point, the former (Canadian) city is not on the Atlantic
Jeff: Actually they are.
Dearstone: Is it still the Atlantic Ocean up there (off the eastern coast of Canada)?
Jeff: Yes, it is.
Dearstone: Well, that still doesn't help your case because there aren't any whales in the Atlantic Ocean.
Jeff (and others) then goes on to correct Dearstone, only to immediately and profusely apologize for having done so.
Of course, Dearstone (and undoubtedly each of his employees who co-anchor the show) would deny that he was serious, as he does each time that he makes some ignorant comment and gets it handed to him on the air. But he was quite serious.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
not true as she was making almost a million when he got here and crossed that line soon after. If anyone, she was kept in line with Geno
what justifies paying her way more than the income her sport makes.... they are losing money every year waiting on the check from the men to pay their bills.
because her sport doesn't bring in enough money to justify it financially.
because her sport doesn't bring in enough money to justify it financially.
I don't believe that's true, but either way that's not the basis of how her salary should be judged. Instead, you should compare it to what her coaching peers make.
Croanin was very adament when he got bumped that Summit's salary would stay near Pearl's. No doubt she was racing to $1M against Geno, but don't discount how much Pearl's first bump from 800K to 1.3M played into it as well.
I still feel she deserves it with what she has accomplished and the type of program that she runs. If the men's team had a coach that had accomplished the same things with their team that she has with the women's I doubt you would be saying that. And besides, they seem to be doing pretty well financially from what I know.
I searched and can't find a quote on that when the contract was signed in 06. And if she really did that then she didn't get close.
I still feel she deserves it with what she has accomplished and the type of program that she runs. If the men's team had a coach that had accomplished the same things with their team that she has with the women's I doubt you would be saying that. And besides, they seem to be doing pretty well financially from what I know.
so if your company brings in say $1,000,000 a year you should go pay the main person responsible $1,500,000 because of what another company pays their employers? no women's athletic department anywhere should make a decision to pay more than what they bring in.