Millions of Illegal Aliens From All Over The World Head For U.S. Border

#6,978
#6,978
lawgator1 said:
Republicans had plenty of opportunity for two years under Trump to pass legislation or real plans to address the border. They could make such proposals now.

But they did not then, and do not now, because it's a wedge issue they can run on. Face facts. The GOP has no intention of any substantive fix to the border problems.
Click to expand...

Do you expect the Rs in the house to pass a law forcing the Biden administration to enforce the current laws?
 
  • Like
Reactions: theFallGuy
#6,979
#6,979
CobbVol said:
Picking vegetables is critical to our country's success.

www.foxnews.com

Dem Rep. Jerry Nadler says we need 'many illegal immigrants' in the country to pick vegetables | Fox News Video

Dem. Rep. Jerry Nadler on Thursday said we need 'many illegal immigrants' in the country to pick vegetables to keep them from rotting. (House Judiciary Committee)
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
It's one of those funny things where dems label everyone "racist" (a term I don't care one bit about but they think it's an insult) while at the same time admitting all they thing they're good for is picking veggies. lol
 
#6,982
#6,982
hog88 said:
What do they need to pass?
Click to expand...

The Senate had agreed on a bipartisan border deal, with at least tentative thumbs up from the House and the WH.

But Trumpilstilskin was worried that would make Biden look good, or at least would lessen the effect of the issue for him in the upcoming election. So the fat f*** started making calls and told GOP Senators to kill it.

All for his own glorification. Face it, he's a menace.
 
#6,983
#6,983
lawgator1 said:
The Senate had agreed on a bipartisan border deal, with at least tentative thumbs up from the House and the WH.

But Trumpilstilskin was worried that would make Biden look good, or at least would lessen the effect of the issue for him in the upcoming election. So the fat f*** started making calls and told GOP Senators to kill it.

All for his own glorification. Face it, he's a menace.
Click to expand...
Are you aware of any details for this "Bipartisan" deal?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#6,984
#6,984
lawgator1 said:
The Senate had agreed on a bipartisan border deal, with at least tentative thumbs up from the House and the WH.

But Trumpilstilskin was worried that would make Biden look good, or at least would lessen the effect of the issue for him in the upcoming election. So the fat f*** started making calls and told GOP Senators to kill it.

All for his own glorification. Face it, he's a menace.
Click to expand...

What did the deal consist of? What would it have done different than if Biden was enforcing current laws?
 
#6,986
#6,986
The House passed HR2 last year. That should be the framework for anything in the Senate.

thehill.com

Speaker Johnson: Senate border deal ‘dead on arrival’ in House

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Friday letter to his colleagues that Senate legislation addressing the border and aid to Ukraine and other countries would have been “dead on arrival” in the …
thehill.com thehill.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, Orangeburst and davethevol
#6,987
#6,987
#6,989
#6,989
lawgator1 said:
The Senate had agreed on a bipartisan border deal, with at least tentative thumbs up from the House and the WH.

But Trumpilstilskin was worried that would make Biden look good, or at least would lessen the effect of the issue for him in the upcoming election. So the fat f*** started making calls and told GOP Senators to kill it.

All for his own glorification. Face it, he's a menace.
Click to expand...

Biden doesnt need a damn thing passed to enforce the border. Just like Trump didnt. This is just more leftist drivel excuse making.

Are you really a lawyer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Orangeburst, hog88 and 1 other person
#6,990
#6,990
just bob said:
Are you aware of any details for this "Bipartisan" deal?
Click to expand...

hog88 said:
What did the deal consist of? What would it have done different than if Biden was enforcing current laws?
Click to expand...


I imagine you can find the details for yourselves. But in any event your insinuation that it was a bad deal, and that is why Trump intervened to kill it, is utterly ridiculous.

First, this was a GOP-sponsored plan. Second, the notion that Trump studied it and called to prevent its adoption because it was bad policy???? .... well, on the face of it, such a claim is patently absurd. Trump doesn't care what the plan would be, he cares only about having the issue remain alive for the upcoming election.

And third, Trump said he was intervening to prevent Biden from having the issue even minimally settled. He simply wants to paint Biden as the obstacle, when in fact it is he, Trump, is now the obstacle. Trump told the Senators that preventing a resolution of the problem -- so he could run on it -- was why he was calling them.
 
#6,991
#6,991
CobbVol said:
The House passed HR2 last year. That should be the framework for anything in the Senate.

thehill.com

Speaker Johnson: Senate border deal ‘dead on arrival’ in House

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Friday letter to his colleagues that Senate legislation addressing the border and aid to Ukraine and other countries would have been “dead on arrival” in the …
thehill.com thehill.com
Click to expand...
everything they are proposing was already passed as a bill before and got sidelined. not sure why this time would be different. and not sure why it needs to be revoted on?
 
#6,992
#6,992
lawgator1 said:
I imagine you can find the details for yourselves. But in any event your insinuation that it was a bad deal, and that is why Trump intervened to kill it, is utterly ridiculous.

First, this was a GOP-sponsored plan. Second, the notion that Trump studied it and called to prevent its adoption because it was bad policy???? .... well, on the face of it, such a claim is patently absurd. Trump doesn't care what the plan would be, he cares only about having the issue remain alive for the upcoming election.

And third, Trump said he was intervening to prevent Biden from having the issue even minimally settled. He simply wants to paint Biden as the obstacle, when in fact it is he, Trump, is now the obstacle. Trump told the Senators that preventing a resolution of the problem -- so he could run on it -- was why he was calling them.
Click to expand...
That does not fill me with positivity. There are some GOP members that are also hell-bent on destruction. No amnesty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#6,995
#6,995
lawgator1 said:
I imagine you can find the details for yourselves. But in any event your insinuation that it was a bad deal, and that is why Trump intervened to kill it, is utterly ridiculous.

First, this was a GOP-sponsored plan. Second, the notion that Trump studied it and called to prevent its adoption because it was bad policy???? .... well, on the face of it, such a claim is patently absurd. Trump doesn't care what the plan would be, he cares only about having the issue remain alive for the upcoming election.

And third, Trump said he was intervening to prevent Biden from having the issue even minimally settled. He simply wants to paint Biden as the obstacle, when in fact it is he, Trump, is now the obstacle. Trump told the Senators that preventing a resolution of the problem -- so he could run on it -- was why he was calling them.
Click to expand...

You have proof, other than notorious anti-Trump Mitt Romney, that Trump did such a thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: malinoisvol
#6,996
#6,996
CobbVol said:
It was not a GOP sponsored plan, unless Sinema and Chris Murphy switched parties.
Click to expand...
I know Langford, the pos from Oklahoma is all about bending the knee. Mac from Kentucky is also all about it too. The right needs to get rid of the nutless losers.
 
#6,997
#6,997
'We need a Strong, Powerful, and essentially 'PERFECT' Border,' Trump wrote from his Truth Social account late Thursday.

The former president said that unless Republicans achieve those goals, 'we are better off not making a deal.'

The 'unsustainable invasion' at the southern border is considered a 'death wish' for the United States, he added.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Johnson says Senate border proposal would be 'dead on arrival'

Speaker Mike Johnson revealed that what he has heard of the Senate national security and border deal is 'dead on arrival' in the House and he will instead focus on impeaching Mayorkas.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silence Dogood and davethevol
#6,998
#6,998
Grand Vol said:
You have proof, other than notorious anti-Trump Mitt Romney, that Trump did such a thing?
Click to expand...

www.foxnews.com

Trump, GOP skeptics of Ukraine aid balk at potential McConnell-Schumer border deal

Former President Trump insists Republicans reject any border security deal lacking comprehensive measures to halt illegal migration.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com





You know, until you asked that question I had not connected all the dots, and so I thank you. Turns out, the deal was for border security AND for Ukraine funding.

Another brick in the Putin-owns-Trump wall.

1706296731823.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sin City Vol
#6,999
#6,999
Franklin Pierce said:
'We need a Strong, Powerful, and essentially 'PERFECT' Border,' Trump wrote from his Truth Social account late Thursday.

The former president said that unless Republicans achieve those goals, 'we are better off not making a deal.'

The 'unsustainable invasion' at the southern border is considered a 'death wish' for the United States, he added.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Johnson says Senate border proposal would be 'dead on arrival'

Speaker Mike Johnson revealed that what he has heard of the Senate national security and border deal is 'dead on arrival' in the House and he will instead focus on impeaching Mayorkas.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...


Backpedaling because he has been caught red handed doing Putin's bidding, yet again.
 
#7,000
#7,000
lawgator1 said:
I imagine you can find the details for yourselves. But in any event your insinuation that it was a bad deal, and that is why Trump intervened to kill it, is utterly ridiculous.

First, this was a GOP-sponsored plan. Second, the notion that Trump studied it and called to prevent its adoption because it was bad policy???? .... well, on the face of it, such a claim is patently absurd. Trump doesn't care what the plan would be, he cares only about having the issue remain alive for the upcoming election.

And third, Trump said he was intervening to prevent Biden from having the issue even minimally settled. He simply wants to paint Biden as the obstacle, when in fact it is he, Trump, is now the obstacle. Trump told the Senators that preventing a resolution of the problem -- so he could run on it -- was why he was calling them.
Click to expand...

First it was not a GOP sponsored plan. Second it is bad legislation because it grants amnesty to hundreds of thousands of people who broke our laws getting here. And third, the house passed a border security plan not linked to aid for Ukraine that wasn't even considered by the Senate so why should the House even consider this dog sh^t piece of legislation that the Administration refuses to compromise on?

Face it LG, we do not need more laws to secure the border we just need this administration to enforce existing laws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL, CBVols, UT_Dutchman and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top