Mitt Romney and his overactive imagination

#51
#51
Why should I? As I said earlier the people knew who they were voting for. He’s the same today as he was in 2016. You guys desperately want to rub people’s noses in it for voting for him. But they just laugh they know who they voted for.

And I say they because I didn’t vote for him last time. But if he keeps up his performance I’ll vote for him next time. And there’s no way in hell I’d ever consider voting for Mitt Romney.

Good analogy, you are treated like a dog that don't know any better than to crap in the house.
 
#54
#54
Why should I? As I said earlier the people knew who they were voting for. He’s the same today as he was in 2016. You guys desperately want to rub people’s noses in it for voting for him. But they just laugh they know who they voted for.

And I say they because I didn’t vote for him last time. But if he keeps up his performance I’ll vote for him next time. And there’s no way in hell I’d ever consider voting for Mitt Romney.

So you don't care about the countless character assessments of respected people who have worked with him?

You'll defend/excuse anything he does...which means you definitely need your nose rubbed in his ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#55
#55
So you don't care about the countless character assessments of respected people who have worked with him?

You'll defend/excuse anything he does...which means you definitely need your nose rubbed in his ****.
Lol. Butthurt because we won’t even acknowledge your supposed point.

I repeat he’s the same person today that he was in 2016 when people voted for him. With one minor difference. He’s your President. 😈
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#57
#57
I’d say Mitt would have handled the office with far more dignity.

You mean he would have rolled over and played dead for the Dims. I despise Trump in almost every way, BUT for the angst he causes the Dims, he's partial payback for Obama. And if he keeps both foreign enemies and "friends" confused, that's absolutely great. It's time our foreign policy was something other than appeasement and apology tours to countries who haven't managed in a couple of hundred years half of what we have without enslaving half the world through colonialism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#58
#58
Lol. Butthurt because we won’t even acknowledge your supposed point.

I repeat he’s the same person today that he was in 2016 when people voted for him. With one minor difference. He’s your President. 😈

Everybody who's been around him is trying to get you to acknowledge his failings as a person and as a president.

Your group doesn't like getting its nose rubbed in **** but refuses to face reality.

He sucks, and you'll go to any length to rationalize supporting him.
 
#60
#60
So you don't care about the countless character assessments of respected people who have worked with him?

You'll defend/excuse anything he does...which means you definitely need your nose rubbed in his ****.

Meh, I think it has more to do with the idea that people, if they were smart, knew that Trump was going to be polarizing.
 
#62
#62
LOL. "inclusion"

Fun fact: Romney got a bigger % of the vote than Trump did.

 
#63
#63
Everybody who's been around him is trying to get you to acknowledge his failings as a person and as a president.

Your group doesn't like getting its nose rubbed in **** but refuses to face reality.

He sucks, and you'll go to any length to rationalize supporting him.
Just because he is not well liked or popular among a certain group of people, that doesn't make him bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#64
#64
Everybody who's been around him is trying to get you to acknowledge his failings as a person and as a president.

Your group doesn't like getting its nose rubbed in **** but refuses to face reality.

He sucks, and you'll go to any length to rationalize supporting him.
No you damn idiots refuse to accept the fact that he’s the same as he was when people voted for him in 2016! We don’t GAF and reject your narratives to make it a point! He’s a lousy person but effective in office! Bill Clinton was a lousy person but moderately effective also! The two between them were decent people and lousy presidents!
 
#66
#66
No you damn idiots refuse to accept the fact that he’s the same as he was when people voted for him in 2016! We don’t GAF and reject your narratives to make it a point! He’s a lousy person but effective in office! Bill Clinton was a lousy person but moderately effective also! The two between them were decent people and lousy presidents!

How on earth is he effective in office?
 
#68
#68
If Mitt would run government like a ruthless private equity manager, then I'd be all for him shaking up the ranks. Too many government workers have jobs for life no matter their production. I think that Trump could be like that, but he has to wait until after the 2020 election.
 
#70
#70
What's he done that's good? Pretty easy to come up with a list of the bad...
Meeting with North Korea, pull out of Syria, potential pull out of Afghanistan, tax cuts (though not as aggressive as I would have liked), didn't push the economy into the ditch, renegotiating bad trade deals, stayed away from bad deals (TPP, TTIP, Paris Climate Agreement).
 
#71
#71
Meeting with North Korea, pull out of Syria, potential pull out of Afghanistan, tax cuts (though not as aggressive as I would have liked), didn't push the economy into the ditch, renegotiating bad trade deals, stayed away from bad deals (TPP, TTIP, Paris Climate Agreement).
Wow you and I agree on more than I would ave guessed.
 
#72
#72
Everybody who's been around him is trying to get you to acknowledge his failings as a person and as a president.

Your group doesn't like getting its nose rubbed in **** but refuses to face reality.

He sucks, and you'll go to any length to rationalize supporting him.

Maybe you could say Reps learned well from the Dims and Obama. Their is one major exception, however; Trump isn't selling out the country like Obama.
 
#73
#73
Meeting with North Korea, pull out of Syria, potential pull out of Afghanistan, tax cuts (though not as aggressive as I would have liked), didn't push the economy into the ditch, renegotiating bad trade deals, stayed away from bad deals (TPP, TTIP, Paris Climate Agreement).


The meeting with North Korea temporarily stopped their known public testing. But so far no reduction in nuclear capability.

The withdrawals from Syria and Afghanistan are idealistic and were prompted by outside influences, without consulting those in government who have knowledge in the area.

Not pushing the economy into a ditch and tax reform are ramping up to be based on more failed trickle down philosophy. Let's see where we are in a year. (Hint, I'm buying gold and silver)

Renegotiation of trade deals is more than just pulling out of them.
 
#74
#74
So you don't care about the countless character assessments of respected people who have worked with him?

You'll defend/excuse anything he does...which means you definitely need your nose rubbed in his ****.
Comments like this are tacit approvals of HRC. I personally don't give two ***** about his character. He could walk necked across the White House lawn with 5 pornstars and he would still have HRC beat in the character department. When are you going to learn that we (at least I) didn't vote for the man, I voted for what he said he would accomplish and against HRC. So far I see myself as winning on both counts.
 
#75
#75
Meeting with North Korea, pull out of Syria, potential pull out of Afghanistan, tax cuts (though not as aggressive as I would have liked), didn't push the economy into the ditch, renegotiating bad trade deals, stayed away from bad deals (TPP, TTIP, Paris Climate Agreement).

So much came from that North Korea meeting. It's great that for the millionth time we've let down allies in the middle east...and another vacuum for ISIS to grow in. Those tax cuts came at the end of a nine year recovery cycle and worked out like a ****** student chugging a redbull at 3AM the night before the exam. Could've and should've waited to do that to stimulate corporate spending during the next eminent slowdown (he wants your popularity points, though).He would've most definitely run the economy into the ditch had he followed through with his 25% January tarrifs. He didn't change jack **** with with NAFTA. TPP would've resulted in fewer trade barriers for us in SE Asia, although RT and Sputnik would lead you to believe otherwise...

Trump is a crappy person and a garbage president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs

VN Store



Back
Top