SugarCC
Gntlmen, u cant fight here, this is the war room!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,397
- Likes
- 39,357
So you’re saying he is developing talent the same today as he was in the early 2000’s? Garner was Midas back then where everything he touched turned to gold. You think recruits today don’t google Garner’s draft picks, compare them to what they were rated coming out of high school, and then could possibly question future development? Sure bud.
Nico is a generational QB.
The DL and OL needs multiple guys. Nico was a complete anomaly, even nationally. It was a way to make a splash, ensure a high level offense for years forward, etc, and it did.
Duh. That is true of every recruit. That is recruiting. It is not worth saying at all, unless somehow you find it personally intolerable to let the opportunity pass of sowing doubt doubt about one of our players on the roster and our coaches. The sum total of recruits for all teams for all time with the final outcome known in advance is zero.....until he plays we won't know....
would you or someone give me a mini education on how the NIL works? So people give money to what or who? Then who gives that money out and has control? And how do they determine what amount to give to what recruits? And what roll does businesses have?You're confusing the coaching staff with the folks at Spyre. They might communicate with each other, but the coaches are not the ones doing any NIL bidding...no matter what you say.
Marlon Davidson and Carl Lawson not being first rounders isn't his fault. Davidson has struggled with lower body injuries throughout his career and he still got drafted second round. He was still very undersized as a prospect and Garner got him up to 2nd round.Some comments I’ve heard about Garner are that he had 5 1st rounders at Georgia from 2001-2005, then had 2 total first rounders since then. A lot of his draft picks came in as highly rated recruits. There’s concern in some circles that’s the development isn’t as strong as it used to be. To paraphrase: ‘you won’t go undrafted with CRG, but you might not go in the 1st either. Not a risk, but not a huge reward like 20 years ago.’
So you’re saying he is developing talent the same today as he was in the early 2000’s? Garner was Midas back then where everything he touched turned to gold. You think recruits today don’t google Garner’s draft picks, compare them to what they were rated coming out of high school, and then could possibly question future development? Sure bud.
I just donate where it goes and to whom¯\_ʘ‿ʘ_/¯would you or someone give me a mini education on how the NIL works? So people give money to what or who? Then who gives that money out and has control? And how do they determine what amount to give to what recruits? And what roll does businesses have?
It's funny when ppl act like they're privy to some "inside coaching circle whisper" and you call them on it, instead of backing it up they say it's just common sense that is what is being said lol.A more pertinent question would be which DL coaches do these “circles” consider to be better developers than CRG? Curious to see the list.
So you think the coaches are actually offering NIL money to recruits? There's a difference between telling Spyre which recruits are a high priority (worthy of a larger NIL investment) and actually talking dollar amounts directly to a recruit. Again, Spyre is the one doing the bidding...not the coaches.I bet they are too.
I think it is coach driven while the legality part is handled by Spyre….So you think the coaches are actually offering NIL money to recruits? There's a difference between telling Spyre which recruits are a high priority (worthy of a larger NIL investment) and actually talking dollar amounts directly to a recruit. Again, Spyre is the one doing the bidding...not the coaches.
Spyre and coaches are in regular communicationwould you or someone give me a mini education on how the NIL works? So people give money to what or who? Then who gives that money out and has control? And how do they determine what amount to give to what recruits? And what roll does businesses have?
So you’re saying he is developing talent the same today as he was in the early 2000’s? Garner was Midas back then where everything he touched turned to gold. You think recruits today don’t google Garner’s draft picks, compare them to what they were rated coming out of high school, and then could possibly question future development? Sure bud.
Thanks so much!Spyre and coaches are in regular communication
People give to Spyre/Vol Club. Spyre coordinates with kids based on a combination of marketing opportunity and player value to program. Marketing opportunity is based on business interest. Player value to program is based on a combination of factors that should be intuitive. Cheering for or against Spyre is cheering for or against our program’s success as it relates to recruiting and player retention in the current world of ncaa and nil
IOW we know the recipe. Sorry not sorry its a family oneSpyre and coaches are in regular communication
People give to Spyre/Vol Club. Spyre coordinates with kids based on a combination of marketing opportunity and player value to program. Marketing opportunity is based on business interest. Player value to program is based on a combination of factors that should be intuitive. Cheering for or against Spyre is cheering for or against our program’s success as it relates to recruiting and player retention in the current world of ncaa and nil