As written no, it applies only to only instate which is where I think there are constitutional issues. Restricting/limiting one's ability to earn only to instate doesn't seem to pass the sniff test. I believe this section will be challenged and likely overturned.
16. (1) A high school athlete who competes on an interscholastic athletic team in 241 this state that is sponsored by a public school or by a private school whose students 242 compete against a public school's students may earn or attempt to earn compensation 243 from the use of such athlete's name, image, likeness rights, or athletic reputation as 244 provided in this section, subject to the following: 245 (a) A high school athlete shall have the right to discuss earning or attempting to 246 earn such compensation before signing an athletic letter of intent or other written 247 agreement only when having discussions about potential enrollment with a 248
postsecondary educational institution in this state; and 249 (b) A high school athlete shall have the right to earn or attempt to earn such 250 compensation only after signing an athletic letter of intent or other written agreement to 251
enroll in a postsecondary educational institution in this state. 252 (2) The discussion of, or earning or attempting to earn, compensation from the 253 use of such high school athlete's name, image, likeness rights, or athletic reputation as 254 provided in this section shall not be construed to be a violation of any rules and 255 regulations a high school student and high schools are required to follow to maintain 256 and
protect a high school athlete's high school eligibility to participate in high school 257 athletics in this state
Bill Text: MO HB417 | 2023 | Regular Session | Enrolled | LegiScan