More Climate BS...

[LSU-SIU]

We were “under water” 20 years ago. When is it going to get bad since they’ve been right so far?

A good portion of southern Louisiana if not a good portion of the gulf coast would be underwater decades ago by just a few feet of sea level change. I have friends still living where the house is on stilts. And he is calling people ignorant while probably wearing a double diaper on his face. So, at best he has a disputed fact. But than we have to have cause and effect, but he really isn't even bringing in enough facts.

Its no different than the old the globe is going to be an ice cube, but even than you have to prove cause and effect.

 

[BowlBrother85]

We were “under water” 20 years ago. When is it going to get bad since they’ve been right so far?

You aren't talking about anything that NASA has disclosed .... and that's all I'm doing - pointing to their coastal tide gauge and satellite data.

 

[ButchPlz]

A good portion of southern Louisiana if not a good portion of the gulf coast would be underwater decades ago by just a few feet of sea level change. I have friends still living where the house is on stilts. And he is calling people ignorant while probably wearing a double diaper on his face.

Didn't SI run a ridiculous fearmongering issue back in the early 2000s showing all the stadiums that would be underwater by now?

 

[hog88]

@McDad

Can you walk me through what, exactly, BB is saying and why you say it is true?

....pit it in Climate change thread please.

Climate change, let's say warming is the change would lead to rising sea levels and flooding so yeah it would have an impact on ports, canals and shipping so what BB said there was true. Of course it would also open up new shipping lanes like the NW passage and others that are typically closed off due to ice.

Where BB is wrong is his thinking the current climate change political/social movement is designed to prevent, slow or stop the climate from changing.

 

[LSU-SIU]

You aren't talking about anything that NASA has disclosed .... and that's all I'm doing - pointing to their coastal tide gauge and satellite data.

And you can point to the government telling you to put a diaper on your face. (for the record I have no idea what data you are looking at or how it was complied, let alone the accuracy)

A good portion of southern Louisiana would be underwater a long time ago.

As far as Human, the last thing they would want is another Ice Age i.e. death.

 

[BowlBrother85]

A good portion of southern Louisiana if not a good portion of the gulf coast would be underwater decades ago by just a few feet of sea level change. I have friends still living where the house is on stilts. And he is calling people ignorant while probably wearing a double diaper on his face. So, at best he has a disputed fact. But than we have to have cause and effect, but he really isn't even bringing in enough facts.

Its no different than the old the globe is going to be an ice cube, but even than you have to prove cause and effect.

Do you really think your anecdotal, micro-level accounts, should supersede NASA's satellite data?

 

[C-south]

You aren't talking about anything that NASA has disclosed .... and that's all I'm doing - pointing to their coastal tide gauge and satellite data.

Is this what they do now since Elon has taken over? I can hear what they say, know what they have said, but see what actually is.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Do you really think your anecdotal, micro-level accounts, should supersede NASA's satellite data?

You are not providing anything of value. A good portion of Louisiana has been at sea level or below sea level, this is a fact. Satellites have nothing to do with anything. Just like that mask you wore had nothing to do with anything.

There isn't anything complex about this, which is why when Katrina came it flooded everything.... the land is at sea level or below sea level in many areas.

 

[BowlBrother85]

And you can point to the government telling you to put a diaper on your face. (for the record I have no idea what data you are looking at or how it was complied, let alone the accuracy)

A good portion of southern Louisiana would be underwater a long time ago.

As far as Human, the last thing they would want is another Ice Age i.e. death.

Here it is again :

Sea Level | NASA Global Climate Change

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.

climate.nasa.gov

 

[LSU-SIU]

NASA's satellite data isn't something of value? Are you saying your anecdotal accounts should carry more weight? You are unreasonable.

If the satellite data was correct or was saying what you claim, you would have effect. Which is why all the people making money off the climate scam buy up beach property.

 

[norrislakevol]

There is no "party", there are people.

Anyone believing this whole "climate change" crap are on a worse level than the mask wears and 8th booster people. Is there pollution, absolutely. The political and financial purpose of that nonsense is a whole other discussion.

Some of us remember when they were claiming the Earth would become one big snow ball.

Absolutely. The only thing green about the green new deal is the money some are going to make off of the scamming of the American people.

If you are railing against the Green New Deal and the theory of man-made global warming? That's fine, but the people who dispute rising sea levels are ignorant. Good lord.

The first sentence in particular is what I am speaking against. How arrogant man is to think we can control mother nature, and those that believe these people fall for their scams like the green new deal. Nature gonna nature. Seas will rise and fall, the earth will cool and warm. Nothing can be done about it and not a dollar extra should be spent on it.

 

[LSU-SIU]

NASA's satellite data isn't something of value? Are you saying your anecdotal accounts should carry more weight? You are unreasonable.

You don't need data, you need effect. Just like they had data that face diaper you were wearing was going to save you. Where is the "effect"?

If what you are claiming is true, you would simply have effect at this point.

 

[hog88]

Didn't SI run a ridiculous fearmongering issue back in the early 2000s showing all the stadiums that would be underwater by now?

Yep, 2007 I think.

 

[BowlBrother85]

You are not providing anything of value. A good portion of Louisiana has been at sea level or below sea level, this is a fact. Satellites have nothing to do with anything. Just like that mask you wore had nothing to do with anything.

There isn't anything complex about this, which is why when Katrina came it flooded everything.... the land is at sea level or below sea level in many areas.

How do satellites measure sea-level change? – NASA Sea Level Change Portal

Visit NASA's portal for an in-depth look at the science behind sea level change.

sealevel.nasa.gov

I'm sorry .... but that really is an ignorant thing to say.

 

[LSU-SIU]

How do satellites measure sea-level change? – NASA Sea Level Change Portal

Visit NASA's portal for an in-depth look at the science behind sea level change.

sealevel.nasa.gov

I'm sorry .... but that really is an ignorant thing to say.

What you are saying is ignorant, **** would be underwater right? Basically the things that were at sea level 50 years ago would be underwater, right?

Do you know what effect is? What is the effect?

I don't need NASA data as there is no effect.


Same scams over and over... 100+ years.
March 1, 1912: Article Links Coal Burning and Global Temperatures

 

[BowlBrother85]

What you are saying is ignorant, **** would be underwater right? Basically the things that were at sea level 50 years ago would be underwater, right?

Do you know what effect is? What is the effect?

I don't need NASA data as there is no effect.

This is why some people refer to the Republican Party as being anti-scientific study.

We have a poster here who doesn't trust NASA data (and just told us that satellites can't measure sea level change) .... I guess it would be hard to trust technology that you don't even understand to begin with.

 

[McDad]

@McDad



Climate change, let's say warming is the change would lead to rising sea levels and flooding so yeah it would have an impact on ports, canals and shipping so what BB said there was true. Of course it would also open up new shipping lanes like the NW passage and others that are typically closed off due to ice.

Where BB is wrong is his thinking the current climate change political/social movement is designed to prevent, slow or stop the climate from changing.

Thanks for the opportunity to dialogue about this.

In BB's linked article, the author says sea levels are predicted to rise 4cm (less than 2") per decade.

Do you generally agree with that premise? FYI, it doesn't matter if you do or don't for me to outline my position on the matter.

 

[LSU-SIU]

This is why some people refer to the Republican Party as being anti-scientific study.

We have a poster here who doesn't trust NASA data (and just told us that satellites can't measure sea level change) .... I guess it would be hard to trust technology that you don't even understand to begin with.

I'm not in the Republican Party.

As far as what you are claiming, you are not showing effect. You claiming something is science, does not make it so. Which is why you were wearing a face diaper.

We have a poster here who doesn't trust NASA data (and just told us that satellites can't measure sea level change) .... I guess it would be hard to trust technology that you don't even understand to begin with.

I don't care about the data or research because you are unwilling to show the "effect". Why do I need data from some third party when you can just show the effect? I can assure you my old house would be underwater with only a few feet change in sea levels, if that.

There isn't anything complex about this.

 

[McDad]

Do you really think your anecdotal, micro-level accounts, should supersede NASA's satellite data?

I have searched for historical or archaeological sea ports submerged due to sea level rise.

I am unable to find any from seas rising. I have found a couple for the ground falling.

See what you can find in your free time, if you don't mind.

 

[LSU-SIU]

I have searched for historical or archaeological sea ports submerged due to sea level rise.

I am unable to find any from seas rising. I have found a couple for the ground falling.

See what you can find in your free time, if you don't mind.

I have mentioned before my father was in charge of marine operations at a company down in port N.O. Everything still exists.

But let's say we actually agreed that somehow the sea level was drastically rising, how in the hell do you have a conversation with someone like that when he can't even find the effect.... I mean that is going to be a brutal conversation to get to the cause.

NPCs... like a robot they are.

 

[hog88]

Thanks for the opportunity to dialogue about this.

In BB's linked article, the author says sea levels are predicted to rise 4cm (less than 2") per decade.

Do you generally agree with that premise? FYI, it doesn't matter if you do or don't for me to outline my position on the matter.

No I don't agree but think it's possible.

My thoughts on climate change are pretty simple, the earths climate has changed numerous times over millennia and will continue to do so. It's the height of human arrogance for us to think we can stop it, slow it or prevent it without causing some other catastrophic side effects. If the people pushing the global warming/climate change agenda were truly concerned about it the research money would be going into how do we (as a species) live and thrive with the changes and not how to stop/slow it. They also wouldn't be buying up beachfront properties.

 

[LSU-SIU]

No I don't agree but think it's possible.

My thoughts on climate change are pretty simple, the earths climate has changed numerous times over millennia and will continue to do so. It's the height of human arrogance for us to think we can stop it, slow it or prevent it without causing some other catastrophic side effects. If the people pushing the global warming/climate change agenda were truly concerned about it the research money would be going into how do we (as a species) live and thrive with the changes and not how to stop/slow it. They also wouldn't be buying up beachfront properties.

I usually can't even figure out the definition they use for "climate change".

He guys, the sea levels are rapidly rising but no houses were lost.

 

[McDad]

No I don't agree but think it's possible.

My thoughts on climate change are pretty simple, the earths climate has changed numerous times over millennia and will continue to do so. It's the height of human arrogance for us to think we can stop it, slow it or prevent it without causing some other catastrophic side effects. If the people pushing the global warming/climate change agenda were truly concerned about it the research money would be going into how do we (as a species) live and thrive with the changes and not how to stop/slow it. They also wouldn't be buying up beachfront properties.

if sea level rise is possible, would you be opposed to discussing as a hypothetical and at a rate of 4cm per decade.
BTW, another source from North Carolina calculates the rise at .06 inches per year.

 

[hog88]

if sea level rise is possible, would you be opposed to discussing as a hypothetical and at a rate of 4cm per decade.
BTW, another source from North Carolina calculates the rise at .06 inches per year.

With you, I'll discuss anything.

 

[McDad]

I have mentioned before my father was in charge of marine operations at a company down in port N.O. Everything still exists.

But let's say we actually agreed that somehow the sea level was drastically rising, how in the hell do you have a conversation with someone like that when he can't even find the effect.... I mean that is going to be a brutal conversation to get to the cause.

NPCs... like a robot they are.

It seems to me one person's "drastic" is another person's "mundane".

What rate of rise would you consider drastic?