More Climate BS...

Purge the USA of golf courses and let cows graze there. Vegetables are more important than golf.
A large number of golf courses are built on old landfills and in regular flood planes. I don’t think it’s a good idea to grow vegetables in either on those places

Edit: yes I know it’s an old post. I’m only responding because it’s pepperjackass.
 
tumblr_70e230ad8f7444d41ce93bb08fd1c0c3_2ff28160_1280.jpg


phpjKQdRr.png

Active Volcanoes map.
 
What is funny about it is there are scientists for and against any CO2 producer. As long as there is big money we will never get a straight answer.
Except that we do have an answer that shows your pic is popular yet very wrong
 
I say this as a big time beef consumer:

It’s stupid if they’re saying cows produce the CO2. It’s not stupid to say that cows are extremely inefficient as livestock/a food source. Beef is impractical long term as the population grows, food insecurity rises, cost of transportation rises, and land is more of a premium… it’s just a fact.

Except the actual fact is that none of those things are a problem. Underpopulation is more of a concern than overpopulation. Americans are over fed not underfed. If you cared about transportation costs, you probably wouldn’t be in the side of the “environmentalist” given all their solutions increase the cost. Land would only become more of a premium if overpopulation were a real concern. It’s not. The left has been trying to scare people with that for years, yet we have about 100 years of data establishing a downward trend in world population growth
 
Good to know that you will be enforcing that standard forum wide.
If I see things I know are factually incorrect I usually call them out. No issue doing that. If I am about to post something so unbelievable I usually fact check it before posting.
 
Check this out:

GM and Ford have said all electric by 2030 and 2035. Dodge just cancelled the Charger and Challenger. All car makers going electric. These are facts, opinions, and questions apparently nobody is asking:


There are 145,000 gas stations in the US. We will need AT LEAST as many charging stations bc it takes longer to charge a car by far than to fill up with gas...home charging could probably offset to an even number...but where are the 145,000 charging stations? Who is gonna build 10 or 15 000 of them a year???

When are we starting construction on the 10 or 15 Nuclear power stations we will need to make enough juice to power electric cars and 18 wheelers for 330 MILLION Americans to drive and charge daily?

Where are all the sub stations, power lines, power poles, the factories to manufacture the products needed to build all of these things, the raw materials for them, the heavy equipment to construct them, the millions of blue collar young folks to build, dig, drive, assemble, wire, test, etc all of this electric infrastructure gonna come from? I have a 21yo and a 14yo...and i see their peers frequently. They aint manly like some of their Dads are.


Where the F$%k is all this gonna come from? The only nuclear plant i know of under construction in the entire US is Vogel part 3 and 4 in northern GA....and only because it was approved...in the 1980s.

The leftist climate electric bullsheit is complete fantasy...with apparently exactly zero forethought, planning, leadership, infrastructure, or possibility of happening a full generation (20 years minimum) after everyone is supposedly stopping production of vehicles that burn dinosaur juice.

Ideas? Thoughts?

Even 1 of you full of sheit leftist morons who cannot grasp the 20,000 year ice age/ hot as Hell cycle want to try and explain where the electricity is gonna magically come from in the next decade to power all these electric cars rhat are gonna be manufactured?

How about the fact that in many places the grid is already over burdened and generally operates at about what 60% efficiency? Are we finally up to 70% ? Meaning for every single kw of electricity produced, 40% is lost and never used due to the inefficency of power lines, sub stations, and other inefficiencies in the grid? How many MORE nuclear power stations will that necessitate? 10? How many decades...not years...decades does it take on average to get a single reactor approved, constructed, and online? Wanna take a guess?

Why is our country planning for a future of unicorns, Santa Claus, and the Tooth Fairy as the source of energy for every means of transportation in the country with the largest economy in the world?

Why have i never read a single article about this or even heard mention of it? Anyone?
Have I ever accused the climate idiots of actually thinking anything through?
 
Read the article ……then check out the response I saw
California bans sale of new gasoline cars by 2035…
Ok, good luck with that Libtards! I just want to buy the biggest diesel truck with huge exhaust and plow down their highway. With fuel spilling all over the ground. With a big FU sign and a flag on the back.
 
just when you might have thought progress being made on removing coal from the equation, even if the article is over a year ago.


China Started More Coal Plants Than The Entire World Retired In 2020
By Tsvetana Paraskova - Apr 07, 2021, 3:31 PM CDT



Despite commitments to become a net-zero emission economy by 2060, China—the world’s biggest carbon emitter—commissioned more coal-fired capacity last year than the rest of the world retired, a new report showed this week.
China’s coal boom in 2020 more than offset the retirements in coal capacity in the rest of the world, leading to the first increase in global coal capacity development since 2015, a report led by Global Energy Monitor (GEM) found.
China commissioned 38.4 gigawatts (GW) of new coal plants in 2020, offsetting the record-tying 37.8 GW of coal capacity retired last year, the report showed.

China’s coal boom accounted for 76 percent of the global 50.3 GW new coal capacity. Globally, commissioning of new plants plunged by 34 percent annually in 2020 due to difficulties obtaining financing and delays due to the pandemic. India, which continues to rely on coal, saw coal power capacity increase by just 0.7 GW in 2020, with 2.0 GW commissioned and 1.3 GW retired, according to the report.
China also has 88.1 GW of coal power under construction. Another 158.7 GW is proposed for construction. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is retreating from coal capacity and is announcing coal retirements.
Last year, the retirements were led by the U.S. with 11.3 GW and the EU with 10.1 GW of retired coal capacity.
“President Trump’s promised coal boom was a bust as U.S. coal plant retirements during Trump’s four-year term rose to 52.4 GW, exceeding the 48.9 GW retired during President Obama’s second term,” Global Energy Monitor said.

Related: OPEC+ Was Wise To Ease Output Cuts Despite Demand Concerns
Commenting on China’s coal boom, Lauri Myllyvirta, lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), said: “Dozens of new coal power projects, equal to the total coal power capacity of Germany and Poland combined, were announced last year in China.”
“Cancelling them would put the country on track to the low-carbon development the leadership says it wants to pursue,” Myllyvirta noted.
China’s coal-fired power generation increased last year as growing electricity demand outpaced the installations of new clean power capacity, making China the only G-20 country with rising coal generation, climate and energy think tank Ember said in a separate report last month.
By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com
 

VN Store



Back
Top