- Joined
- Oct 16, 2004
- Messages
- 47,161
- Likes
- 834
I don't. Personally, I shudder think about the thousands of rednecks that actually think that Obama and Osama are related now. It was bad enough trying to teach people that Iraq didn't attack us 9/11, nobody needs to add to the confusion.
98%? That would be encouraging. I fear you give Americans too much credit.
He is just a guy representing a small % of Americans that are angry and so angry they are willing to roll the dice with a Muslim as our POTUS. That I simply can not support.
I would consider myself a republican but to be honest I am fed up with all politicians. I honestly believe the system has been corrupted and both parties are in the pockets of lobbyists.
KB5252, you and I don't agree on a lot philosophically, but I totally understand your sentiments here. I worked as a reporter on Capitol Hill for 3 years right out of school, and one thing I learned is that 99.9% of politicians are "corrupt." They're not, and shouldn't be, our heroes. I enter most elections knowing that the candidates I'm considering are self-motivated egomaniacs.
I also understand that many don't feel like they know a whole lot about Obama. Honestly, I don't care. I don't care if Obama smokes or has done shady business dealings or isn't as "harmonious" as his campaign makes him out to be.
For the past 8 years I've worked in advertising, and I have a different perspective now. I like Obama's brand - I like what he stands for (optimism, not cynicism, civic involvement, open-mindedness, unity - all those fluffy things, yes, I like them). But mostly I like that he's inspired so many people to actually care (for once) about civil activity and get off their butts and get involved. And that for once someone is chipping away at my pessimism and cynicism.
So, for me, it's more about his brand and his impact on a large group of voters than it is the actual person. And I think the vote does matter.
Who did he inspire to what?KB5252, you and I don't agree on a lot philosophically, but I totally understand your sentiments here. I worked as a reporter on Capitol Hill for 3 years right out of school, and one thing I learned is that 99.9% of politicians are "corrupt." They're not, and shouldn't be, our heroes. I enter most elections knowing that the candidates I'm considering are self-motivated egomaniacs.
I also understand that many don't feel like they know a whole lot about Obama. Honestly, I don't care. I don't care if Obama smokes or has done shady business dealings or isn't as "harmonious" as his campaign makes him out to be.
For the past 8 years I've worked in advertising, and I have a different perspective now. I like Obama's brand - I like what he stands for (optimism, not cynicism, civic involvement, open-mindedness, unity - all those fluffy things, yes, I like them). But mostly I like that he's inspired so many people to actually care (for once) about civil activity and get off their butts and get involved. And that for once someone is chipping away at my pessimism and cynicism.
So, for me, it's more about his brand and his impact on a large group of voters than it is the actual person. And I think the vote does matter.
For the past 8 years I've worked in advertising, and I have a different perspective now. I like Obama's brand - I like what he stands for (optimism, not cynicism, civic involvement, open-mindedness, unity - all those fluffy things, yes, I like them). But mostly I like that he's inspired so many people to actually care (for once) about civil activity and get off their butts and get involved. And that for once someone is chipping away at my pessimism and cynicism.
So, for me, it's more about his brand and his impact on a large group of voters than it is the actual person. And I think the vote does matter.
Who did he inspire to what?
I can appreciate the idea but I view his brand to be more like Coke. Looks good but in the end it's filled with empty calories and too much of it will leave Americans fat and lazy. Smaller doses as a treat, not the whole meal.
how is it new that some ultraliberal, slick talking politician whipped up the young crowd into activism and voting? there's nothing refreshing about that. It's simply liberal politics 101.Who - US citizens, especially younger ones
What - register, vote, contribute and volunteer
reallyboring.net Obama good for voter turnout
and
Clinton donors open their chequebooks for Obama | World news | guardian.co.uk
By contrast, Obama's campaign has relied on a deeper pool of small-time donations. Forty-five percent of his total contributions this election cycle were $200 or less, compared to 30% for Clinton. Obama's better success at broadening his donor base with contributors who can be tapped over and over again has helped him raise more than $231m for the primary election, compared to $171.6m raised by Clinton.
how is it new that some ultraliberal, slick talking politician whipped up the young crowd into activism and voting? there's nothing refreshing about that. It's simply liberal politics 101.
I'm fine with you liking Obama, but pretending that he has some new face to politicking is absurd.
I'm not trying to change anything. Your parenthesized 'for once' comment implies that he's doing something new. If not, that was a typo.I didn't write that.
Here's what I wrote:
"But mostly I like that he's inspired so many people to actually care (for once) about civil activity and get off their butts and get involved. And that for once someone is chipping away at my pessimism and cynicism."
If you say it's not new, that's fine. It doesn't change what I wrote or what I think.