Mr. Speaker, answer the question

#78
#78
Many of you supported the impeachment of a sitting potus bc you were idiots. Stop thinking you have the moral or intellectual high ground. You Dont. Doesn't mean that the GOP crack pots are right. It just means that you all should be held account for your shat. You and those you support who did the same. Funny how you never call them to account. Just an aw shucks. Or some lame ass attempt to deflect

To be clear, if at any point you claimed Trump illegimate then there is no difference in you and Biden deniers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BisonVol, Vol since 77, MemphisVol77 and 2 others
#79
#79
BowlBrother85 said:
I haven't mentioned that in a long time .... but it's fair to say that based on the e-mail exchanges between Rob Goldstone and Donald Trump Jr., that the Trump Campaign took that meeting because they wanted dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian agents. It's also fair to point out both Trump and Trump Jr. lied about the purpose of the meeting and who was in attendance. That also raised legitimate questions.

However, I have never said that Russia had any role in the outcome of the 2016 Presidential Election. I believe that Donald Trump won in 2016 for the same reason that Joe Biden won in 2020 .... he was running against a flawed opponent who stoked anger in his base of support.
Click to expand...
Fair assessment. But I would add this.

Trump outworked Hillary. Plain and simple. He was flying all over the country from one rally to the next. He was giving interviews from sun up to sun down. She thought she had it and tried to coast to the finish line. He fought for it harder down the stretch. In a tight race that made the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#81
#81
What does it matter what he says at this point lol

It's been 3 years, they aren't going to do a recount. LG hysteria
 
#82
#82
85SugarVol said:
Lol. BB argued for days over the meaning of the word collude and that people were too hung up on that word.
Click to expand...
This is what I have maintained, and it's accurate :

"We did not address 'collusion,' which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not."

-- Robert Mueller

Collusion is not a specific crime. This forum has been way too hung up on the use of that word.
 
#83
#83
MercyPercy said:
What does it matter what he says at this point lol

It's been 3 years, they aren't going to do a recount. LG hysteria
Click to expand...
Funny you mention recount .... There was a partisan recount done in Maricopa County, Arizona. Remember the Cyber Ninjas? It took several months in 2021 .... but it only served to add votes to Biden's victory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#84
#84
BowlBrother85 said:
Funny you mention recount .... There was a partisan recount done in Maricopa County, Arizona. Remember the Cyber Ninjas? It took several months in 2021 .... but it only served to add votes to Biden's victory.
Click to expand...
www.theguardian.com

Jill Stein's election recount ends as Wisconsin finds 131 more Trump votes

After weeks of legal wrangling yielded only one electoral review, Wisconsin found that Donald Trump’s margin of victory over Hillary Clinton had increased
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com



Familiar story
 
#85
#85
lawgator1 said:
Who won the 2020 Presidential election ?

Do not merge this. It deserves its own thread now that there is a new SOH


He's second in line of succession, the American people need to know if he is still an election denier.
Click to expand...
Yet you support an educated supreme Court judge, who can't answer what a woman is?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tnslim1, StarRaider, BisonVol and 4 others
#86
#86
BowlBrother85 said:
Funny you mention recount .... There was a partisan recount done in Maricopa County, Arizona. Remember the Cyber Ninjas? It took several months in 2021 .... but it only served to add votes to Biden's victory.
Click to expand...

I recall. I honestly don't know anything about this new dork. If he's an election denier he's an idiot (or made a political decision to publicly support it, which may also qualify), but I just can't take this thread seriously. LG demanding he pinky promise the election wasn't rigged for his pleasure as if that's going to really help anything
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hog88, joevol33, MemphisVol77 and 1 other person
#89
#89
BowlBrother85 said:
This is what I have maintained, and it's accurate :

"We did not address 'collusion,' which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not."

-- Robert Mueller

Collusion is not a specific crime. This forum has been way too hung up on the use of that word.
Click to expand...
Yep. That’s what it was.

Thanks for the stroll down memory lane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc
#91
#91
MercyPercy said:
I recall. I honestly don't know anything about this new dork. If he's an election denier he's an idiot (or made a political decision to publicly support it, which may also qualify), but I just can't take this thread seriously. LG demanding he pinky promise the election wasn't rigged for his pleasure as if that's going to really help anything
Click to expand...
I think it is political expediency for most Republicans. MTG and Kari Lake are true believers. I think most Republicans are smarter than that. This "rigging" would have needed to involve some combination of 3 states .... and 2 of them had Republican governors (Kemp and Ducey). It doesn't make any sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BisonVol, MemphisVol77 and volfanhill
#94
#94
volinbham said:
2nd in line? Kamala is second in line; this dude is 3rd and as soon as Kamala appoints a VP he's back to 3rd.

Blumenthal suggested Kavanaugh was a serial gang rapist - talk about someone that should have been sued...

Pelosi said plenty of stupid, crazy things and I don't recall anyone saying it's a threat since she's "2nd in line to the Presidency".

you don't like the guy - I get it. I'm not a fan either but I"m not going to go all double standard as a result
Click to expand...
He is the 2nd person in the line of succession. I think you could have figure out I meant, but it's fun to complain. Patty Murray is 3rd. Antony Blinken is 4th.

Honestly, I had never even heard of him until yesterday. Party leaders should be held to a higher standard.
 
#98
#98
EasternVol said:
There haven't been plenty after every election. In modern times just Kennedy/Nixon, Gore/Bush, and the last two.
Click to expand...
.... and let's face it, Trump took election denial to new heights.

Trump actually believed that his Vice President could refuse to count electoral votes from states they had lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#99
#99
lawgator1 said:
Who won the 2020 Presidential election ?

Do not merge this. It deserves its own thread now that there is a new SOH


He's second in line of succession, the American people need to know if he is still an election denier.
Click to expand...


You didn’t start a thread when any of theses radical leftists questioned the election.

Reps. Jeffries, Schiff, and Pelosi all previously denied the legitimacy of the 2016 election​


www.foxnews.com

Top Dem’s tweet calling 2016 election 'illegitimate' resurfaces amid opposition to Speaker Johnson

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries was blasted on social media for calling House Speaker Johnson an "election denier" despite his own repeated questioning of the 2016 presidential election.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
#100
#100
TNVOLNAVY said:
You didn’t start a thread when any of theses radical leftists questioned the election.

Reps. Jeffries, Schiff, and Pelosi all previously denied the legitimacy of the 2016 election​


www.foxnews.com

Top Dem’s tweet calling 2016 election 'illegitimate' resurfaces amid opposition to Speaker Johnson

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries was blasted on social media for calling House Speaker Johnson an "election denier" despite his own repeated questioning of the 2016 presidential election.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Donald Trump has done so much more than merely cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election's outcome.

He tried to overturn the outcome with a ridiculous strategy, steeped with conflicts of interest, that involved his Vice President refusing to include states they lost during the certification of the electoral college vote.

Among other things, this strategy included acts of election fraud. Some of these "alternate electors" were foolish enough, in states like Georgia, to sign their names to documents in which they falsely claimed to already be the lawfully chosen electors from their states. Some of them have already pleaded guilty, and they will go to jail. Deservedly so.

Your "what-about-ism" doesn't cover this alternate elector strategy, and Trump's attempt to overturn his own defeat.

Also .... the fact that Donald Trump has whined about election fraud in every election should be an indicator that regardless of the circumstances, Trump would never be man enough to admit that he lost a fair election. He's too much of a sniveling narcissist.

1) During the 2016 Republican Party primary, Trump accused the Ted Cruz Campaign of cheating to win the Iowa Caucuses. He never provided any proof in support of this claim.

2) During the 2016 Presidential General Election, Trump claimed that Hillary Clinton finished with lead in the popular vote because 3 million illegal immigrants had all voted .... and done so, for her. He never provided any proof of this claim.

3) During the 2020 Presidential General Election, he made countless provably false claims concerning fraud..

Can there be any doubt that he will allege fraud again next year? And his cult will go along for the ride .... one last time.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top