Mueller Report Imminent

#3,928
#3,928
Hunerwadel said:
Absolutely. I think obstruction of justice fits anyones definition of a high crime. I believe conspiracy to obstruct justice also fits. People are arrested all the time for planning crimes that never get carried out. It seems the President's men saved his ass by not firing Mueller.

I believe it would be a gift to Trump and the Right if the Democrats attempt to bring impeachment charges. They're going to get a lot of milage by following up of findings in the Mueller report. (PS, I have only read excerpts, I plan to read it all when I get time)
Click to expand...
You know there is a reason people surround themselves with experts right? Especially those in charge, who literally could not fully understand EVERYTHING they have to deal with. Its literally their job to save the President's ass.

seems like Trump knows how to surround himself with a good support staff. A very important skill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,929
#3,929
LouderVol said:
You know there is a reason people surround themselves with experts right? Especially those in charge, who literally could not fully understand EVERYTHING they have to deal with. Its literally their job to save the President's ass.

seems like Trump knows how to surround himself with a good support staff. A very important skill.
Click to expand...
Why did he get rid of them?
 
#3,933
#3,933
Hope I’m still alive when the movie about the coup of Trump comes out. I doubt any liberal Hollywood actors would pertake in it, but starving actors would.
 
#3,935
#3,935
n_huffhines said:
You didn't answer the question, which answers my question (and your original question).
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
#3,936
#3,936
Last edited:
#3,937
#3,937
AirVol said:
This is from CNN. Poor guy Scott Jennings, RIP

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opinions/mueller-report-obama-jennings/index.html
Click to expand...
That is a column with many valid points of criticism at the Obama administration. Obama was in power while this was going on and failed to act to even the slightest degree. It was bad leadership, no getting around that. However, where this column fails (and suggests a hint of partisanship) is that it doesn't even mention that as a candidate and also while as President, Donald Trump continued to publicly side with Putin's denials of Russian interference into the 2016 Presidential election and cast doubt on the conclusions of the United States Intelligence Community. He did it as recently as last July in the infamous Helsinki press conference with his "I don't see why it would be (Russia)" line while standing right next to Putin. The American people deserved to see a strong response to Russia over this... and we have been let down by weak leadership from both parties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinbham
#3,938
#3,938
BowlBrother85 said:
That is a column with many valid points of criticism at the Obama administration. Obama was in power while this was going on and failed to act to even the slightest degree. It was bad leadership, no getting around that. However, where this column fails (and suggests a hint of partisanship) is that it doesn't even mention that as a candidate and also while as President, Donald Trump continued to publicly side with Putin's denials of Russian interference into the 2016 Presidential election and cast doubt on the conclusions of the United States Intelligence Community. He did it as recently as last July in the infamous Helsinki press conference with his "I don't see why it would be (Russia)" line while standing right next to Putin. The American people deserved to see a strong response to Russia over this... and we have been let down by weak leadership from both parties.
Click to expand...

Strong Response over Facebook posts and someone not knowing how to use email.... surely we have bigger things to deal with than that.
 
#3,939
#3,939
volbeast33 said:
Strong Response over Facebook posts and someone not knowing how to use email.... surely we have bigger things to deal with than that.
Click to expand...
How ignorant. Russia's intrusion involved much more than that... and no, we don't have better things to do than protect our democracy from the influence of foreign adversaries.
 
#3,942
#3,942
Eric Swalwell... what a douche. Wants Trump to walk the plank... blinded by logic and reason. Asked if the shoe was on the other foot, would he want Clinton to be impeached since she destroyed key emails that contained damaging evidence against her..his reply... " Sorry, I don't think I follow your question".

Sticking to the agenda come hell or high water... just like Mick, EL, LG and a slew of others here. Shameful... just nothing left to the Democratic party worth a dime, cannot legislate or deal with real issues in this country. You guys are taking this country down, and seemingly enjoying the ride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, NorthDallas40, RavinDave and 3 others
#3,944
#3,944
AM64 said:
But a lot of libs did ... libs have always fallen hook, line, and sinker for Russian lies and propaganda.
Click to expand...
Show me a liberal who has publicly sided with Putin's denial of Russian meddling the way Trump did in Helsinki last July (even over the word of his own DNI, Dan Coats).
 
#3,947
#3,947
GAVol said:
Those semantics are hard for me to get my head around. When does any investigation end in an official exoneration?
Click to expand...

Prosecutors prefer charges or they don't. To speak of exoneration would both sound like playing judge and jury and bring up a question about why they wasted their time and our money on a worthless gesture. It's always got to be there was reason to look but not enough to bring charges ... saving face. The only time that would be different is a whitewash for a political crony ... and Trump was absolutely nobody's political crony.
 
#3,948
#3,948
luthervol said:
So you ask a question and then reject the answer? Classic
Click to expand...

You mean something like holding an election to decide who will be president and the losers then spending three years rejecting the answer ... that kind of rejecting an answer?
 
#3,950
#3,950
AM64 said:
Prosecutors prefer charges or they don't. To speak of exoneration would both sound like playing judge and jury and bring up a question about why they wasted their time and our money on a worthless gesture. It's always got to be there was reason to look but not enough to bring charges ... saving face. The only time that would be different is a whitewash for a political crony ... and Trump was absolutely nobody's political crony.
Click to expand...
Trey Gowdy just nailed it. DOJ files charges and issues indictments. They don't write research papers for public consumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top