How do you know that to be true? Gut feeling or can you actually prove it? You make these definitive statements as if they are fact when they are most likely unfounded opinion. It's as if you don't believe you could be wrong.
Most are my opinions, but I believe my opinions are usually rooted in facts, some more than others. It's kind of like Hitler/bad.........Gandhi/good. Those are opinions, but so many agree with those opinions that they are pretty much accepted as facts.
Clinton/good.......Reagan/bad. Those are also opinions, but there is not enough agreement to validate either. Both sides can be supported and countered with facts.
I actually respect and mostly understand your position on the need to accept the results of a legitimate election.
I always followed that policy prior to Trump. That's why I stated at the very start that the best case scenario was for Russia to have influenced the results of the election and the worst case scenario was for the election to have been free and fair.
My opinion is that everyone has a limit as to what they are willing to accept and tolerate in an elected official; Trump is the first president in my lifetime that exceeded my limit.
I realize Obama exceeded some people's limit.
Bush exceeded some people's limit.
Clinton exceeded some people's limit.
Reagan exceeded some people's limit.
The next president (no matter who and no matter which party) will exceed some people's limit.
Trump exceeded more people's limit than any modern day president. I think it has been close to "critical mass" since day one. I do not think that simply represents a trend that will inevitably continue. It can't.
That is why Trump must be viewed as an anomaly and never as the norm. If Trump is the new norm, if all are equally horrendously despicable, .......