Mueller Report Imminent

#7,526
#7,526
Weezer said:
Everyone's entitled to have their own opinions, but wishing ill on the man because you disagree with his politics is harsh, and IMO, not cool. Take the high road.
Click to expand...
I did. Not wishing him death by hanging just bad enough health to step down. This man is doing too much harm to this country with this charade.
 
#7,537
#7,537
afb052719dAPR20190528064507.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, ajvol01 and AM64
#7,539
#7,539
evillawyer said:
Amash is once again not being a blind Trumper. The nerve of this guy!

Click to expand...


"Prior to making the redacted version of the Mueller report public, Barr released a four-page letter supposedly summarizing the report. In that letter, Barr told Congress that Mueller had not reached a decision about whether the president should be indicted for obstructing justice. Barr added that he had reviewed the evidence and found it to be "not sufficient" to conclude that the president had committed a crime.

Once the nearly full text of the Mueller report was released, however, it became obvious that Mueller's decision not to draw a conclusion about the obstruction question hinged on two factors: longstanding Justice Department precedent that forbids the indictment of a sitting president, and Mueller's belief that Congress was the constitutionally appropriate body to determine the question of obstruction (and the related question of impeachment).

Barr's March 24 letter to Congress, Amash wrote on Tuesday, "selectively quotes and summarizes points in Mueller's report in misleading ways." Amash zeroed-in on Barr's claim that the White House "fully cooperated" with the investigation. In fact, as the Mueller report makes clear, investigators sought to interview the president directly and instead had to settle for written answers, which Amash said were "incomplete or unresponsive."
​
Certainly, Trump was well within his rights to refuse to comply with a voluntary request for an interview with Mueller. But Barr's description of the White House's full and complete cooperation with the investigation is an exaggeration at best.

Indeed, Mueller has claimed the attorney general's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the report—though it is admittedly difficult to distill a 400-plus page report into a four-page letter. Barr did eventually release the full report, so Amash's (and others) complaints about Barr's misleading letter are effectively a complaint about the head of the Justice Department's role in doing public relations for the president."

Justin Amash Blasts Attorney General Barr: 'The Public and Congress Were Misled'
 
Last edited:
#7,540
#7,540
n_huffhines said:
"Barr's March 24 letter to Congress, Amash wrote on Tuesday, "selectively quotes and summarizes points in Mueller's report in misleading ways." Amash zeroed-in on Barr's claim that the White House "fully cooperated" with the investigation. In fact, as the Mueller report makes clear, investigators sought to interview the president directly and instead had to settle for written answers, which Amash said were "incomplete or unresponsive."
​
Certainly, Trump was well within his rights to refuse to comply with a voluntary request for an interview with Mueller. But Barr's description of the White House's full and complete cooperation with the investigation is an exaggeration at best.

Indeed, Mueller has claimed the attorney general's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the report—though it is admittedly difficult to distill a 400-plus page report into a four-page letter. Barr did eventually release the full report, so Amash's (and others) complaints about Barr's misleading letter are effectively a complaint about the head of the Justice Department's role in doing public relations for the president."

Justin Amash Blasts Attorney General Barr: 'The Public and Congress Were Misled'
Click to expand...
Lol
 
#7,542
#7,542
n_huffhines said:
"Prior to making the redacted version of the Mueller report public, Barr released a four-page letter supposedly summarizing the report. In that letter, Barr told Congress that Mueller had not reached a decision about whether the president should be indicted for obstructing justice. Barr added that he had reviewed the evidence and found it to be "not sufficient" to conclude that the president had committed a crime.

Once the nearly full text of the Mueller report was released, however, it became obvious that Mueller's decision not to draw a conclusion about the obstruction question hinged on two factors: longstanding Justice Department precedent that forbids the indictment of a sitting president, and Mueller's belief that Congress was the constitutionally appropriate body to determine the question of obstruction (and the related question of impeachment).

Barr's March 24 letter to Congress, Amash wrote on Tuesday, "selectively quotes and summarizes points in Mueller's report in misleading ways." Amash zeroed-in on Barr's claim that the White House "fully cooperated" with the investigation. In fact, as the Mueller report makes clear, investigators sought to interview the president directly and instead had to settle for written answers, which Amash said were "incomplete or unresponsive."
​
Certainly, Trump was well within his rights to refuse to comply with a voluntary request for an interview with Mueller. But Barr's description of the White House's full and complete cooperation with the investigation is an exaggeration at best.

Indeed, Mueller has claimed the attorney general's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the report—though it is admittedly difficult to distill a 400-plus page report into a four-page letter. Barr did eventually release the full report, so Amash's (and others) complaints about Barr's misleading letter are effectively a complaint about the head of the Justice Department's role in doing public relations for the president."

Justin Amash Blasts Attorney General Barr: 'The Public and Congress Were Misled'
Click to expand...

Amash is a bitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#7,549
#7,549
hjeagle1vol said:
No we hate politicians who put their personal gains (being hurt by China tariffs) ahead of America first. Do a little research, open your mind, and break free brother. I'll pray for your perspective and wisdom.
Click to expand...

I have no idea why you're talking about tariffs, but they are bad for America. Take your own advice and do some research.
 
#7,550
#7,550
n_huffhines said:
I have no idea why you're talking about tariffs, but they are bad for America. Take your own advice and do some research.
Click to expand...
As I said, do some Amish research on his and family companies and how they're being hurt by the tariffs. Then you'll understand why that POS is standing against Trump. You are a complete idiot if you believe it's about ethics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, AM64 and Orange_Vol1321
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top