Mueller Report Imminent

#9,302
#9,302
Weezer said:
What do his tax returns and financial records have to do with his job as POTUS? Oversight doesn't mean digging free nilly through every aspect of his life hoping to find something they can use against him. Oversight is about his job as President. But hey, if this is the precedent the left is wanting to set, I fully expect it will come back to bite them in the future. Seems stupid to me when they could just focus on beating him in 2020, but maybe they don't believe they can beat him?
Click to expand...

I don't know about the tax return thing, other than it seems like they'll get them. Doesn't mean they can make them public, though.

I think he's neck deep in foreign money.. Russians,. Saudis etc.. But anything short of criminal activity, such as laundering money won't be provable. That's why they want the Deutsche Bank records.

So, yeah,. I'm guessing the same thing about fearing defeat in 2020. I think a backfire could be the self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
#9,303
#9,303
Stew Cook said:
I don't know about the tax return thing, other than it seems like they'll get them. Doesn't mean they can make them public, though.

I think he's neck deep in foreign money.. Russians,. Saudis etc.. But anything short of criminal activity, such as laundering money won't be provable. That's why they want the Deutsche Bank records.

So, yeah,. I'm guessing the same thing about fearing defeat in 2020. I think a backfire could be the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Click to expand...

Name me one billionaire that is not global.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#9,304
#9,304
Weezer said:
I'm trying to figure out how Trump can be totally incompetent, yet also a brilliant mastermind able to keep a multitude of crimes covered up? Shouldn't it be one or the other? Seriously, he's a douche bag human being, and I understand not liking him, but the left has let their feelings for the man override their reason. For the millionth time, stop worrying about impeachment and focus on 2020.
Click to expand...

LOL, this is the same thing they did to Bush 43.

He was painted as a complete dunce then had to rationalize Cheney was his handler.
 
#9,306
#9,306
T-TownVol said:
Name me one billionaire that is not global.
Click to expand...

I don't know if Trump is a billionaire or not, but it wouldn't be a problem to have foreign creditors, but it would be a crime to not disclose them. I don't think conflict of interest would be enough to cause a stir, only provable money laundrring or some otherwise shady transactions.

Maybe all billionaires are doing it, whatever it is.. but if it's dubious and you end up being president... Well, better have covered you arse.

Damn, I gotta get off here.
 
#9,307
#9,307
Stew Cook said:
I don't know if Trump is a billionaire or not, but it wouldn't be a problem to have foreign creditors, but it would be a crime to not disclose them. I don't think conflict of interest would be enough to cause a stir, only provable money laundrring or some otherwise shady transactions.

Maybe all billionaires are doing it, whatever it is.. but if it's dubious and you end up being president... Well, better have covered you arse.

Damn, I gotta get off here.
Click to expand...

Wait....are we still talking about Trump? Oooorrrr The Clintons???
 
#9,311
#9,311
Stew Cook said:
I don't know if Trump is a billionaire or not, but it wouldn't be a problem to have foreign creditors, but it would be a crime to not disclose them. I don't think conflict of interest would be enough to cause a stir, only provable money laundrring or some otherwise shady transactions.

Maybe all billionaires are doing it, whatever it is.. but if it's dubious and you end up being president... Well, better have covered you arse.

Damn, I gotta get off here.
Click to expand...

Just throwing this out there, but 2 1/2 years of being analy probed by the Meuller, Weissmann team and there’s nothing accusatory in the report about Trumps finances and how he moved money around to my knowledge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, ajvol01 and T-TownVol
#9,312
#9,312
nuclearjunky said:
Just throwing this out there, but 2 1/2 years of being analy probed by the Meuller, Weissmann team and there’s nothing accusatory in the report about Trumps finances and how he moved money around to my knowledge.
Click to expand...

I don't think Mueller looked into it. If he did, it's not evident in the report. I suppose it could be that he did and it were redacted, or not included.

I think @RockyTop85 could give a definitive answer as to what extent it was covered.
 
#9,313
#9,313
Stew Cook said:
Well, there is that.. although I'm of the mind that there isn't much to see other than exaggerated wealth and self-serving tax cuts.

The Whitehouse has essentially refused to cooperate with Congressional oversight and inquiries, as well as filing suits to stop financial statements from Deutsche Bank and others being released.

They're stalling, and the courts will force compliance. Doesn't much matter why they want it.
Click to expand...

Didn’t the Muell get all of that?
 
#9,314
#9,314
nuclearjunky said:
Just throwing this out there, but 2 1/2 years of being analy probed by the Meuller, Weissmann team and there’s nothing accusatory in the report about Trumps finances and how he moved money around to my knowledge.
Click to expand...
I don’t think he had a free pass to look into ALL things trump
 
#9,316
#9,316
Stew Cook said:
I don't know if Trump is a billionaire or not, but it wouldn't be a problem to have foreign creditors, but it would be a crime to not disclose them. I don't think conflict of interest would be enough to cause a stir, only provable money laundrring or some otherwise shady transactions.

Maybe all billionaires are doing it, whatever it is.. but if it's dubious and you end up being president... Well, better have covered you arse.

Damn, I gotta get off here.
Click to expand...

It’s a crime not disclosing foreign creditors?
 
#9,317
#9,317
hog88 said:
It’s a crime not disclosing foreign creditors?
Click to expand...
On a financial disclosure it would be. This shows how much I've speculated, regarding whether or not POTUS is obliged to. That was my thinking, and Google said presidential candidates do. So, yes apparently.
 
#9,319
#9,319
Stew Cook said:
I don't think Mueller looked into it. If he did, it's not evident in the report. I suppose it could be that he did and it were redacted, or not included.

I think @RockyTop85 could give a definitive answer as to what extent it was covered.
Click to expand...

It wasn’t addressed unless it was in a footnote. It’s not far fetched to think they looked, but if they found anything unrelated to Russian interference, it would have been outside the scope of the investigation and still subject to OLC opinion. I guess it would have been referred out to SDNY or another USA’s office.

I tend to think it’s unlikely that there are significant financial crimes hanging out there and nobody else has been indicted. You’d think there would have been other Trump Co. Execs involved. Either they haven’t been reviewed or they’re clean.
 
#9,321
#9,321
RockyTop85 said:
It wasn’t addressed unless it was in a footnote. It’s not far fetched to think they looked, but if they found anything unrelated to Russian interference, it would have been outside the scope of the investigation and still subject to OLC opinion. I guess it would have been referred out to SDNY or another USA’s office.

I tend to think it’s unlikely that there are significant financial crimes hanging out there and nobody else has been indicted. You’d think there would have been other Trump Co. Execs involved. Either they haven’t been reviewed or they’re clean.
Click to expand...

Entirely possible but how do you square that with charges against Manafort?
 
#9,322
#9,322
RockyTop85 said:
It wasn’t addressed unless it was in a footnote. It’s not far fetched to think they looked, but if they found anything unrelated to Russian interference, it would have been outside the scope of the investigation and still subject to OLC opinion. I guess it would have been referred out to SDNY or another USA’s office.

I tend to think it’s unlikely that there are significant financial crimes hanging out there and nobody else has been indicted. You’d think there would have been other Trump Co. Execs involved. Either they haven’t been reviewed or they’re clean.
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking. So, basically we don't know if Congress is digging into the things OSC has already looked into, such as Deutsche Bank etc.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top