Mueller Report Imminent

#12,551
#12,551
Mick said:
We know you enjoy looking and acting foolish. You've been called out on it multiple times by multiple people that you so call like to "troll". You repeat every fake news line that comes down the sewer pipe as truths. So if someone called you deplorable, It would be too kind.
Click to expand...

Show my posts where I repeat every fake news line . I’ll wait for you try to spin this one . Lol
 
#12,552
#12,552
Stoerner Fumbles said:
I’ve read every report related to this case, cover to cover. I have two friends in the DOJ, and one on the federal court of internal review supervising internal discipline. The FISA applications were sloppy. I don’t like that. I know enough about investigative work to know it’s all too common. That said, the investigation was sound. Trump is guilty of the matters being tried, and more. If you want to follow a curatorial journalist who was also an attorney, read Seth Abramson. He has the largest footnoted library of this case of anyone. Read his two books, and then get back to me.
Click to expand...

A couple of things. You accuse others of being "conspiracists", but hold on to the whack notions from Seth Abramson? The guy who thinks Trump colluded with Russia and other state actors in 2013 to plan to run for President. You think Seth Abramson knows info beyond what Mueller investigated and in your words is "guilty and more".

Talk about your Dunning Krugger effect. You are FOS.
 
#12,553
#12,553
Orangeburst said:
A couple of things. You accuse others of being "conspiracists", but hold on to the whack notions from Seth Abramson? The guy who thinks Trump colluded with Russia and other state actors in 2013 to plan to run for President. You think Seth Abramson knows info beyond what Mueller investigated and in your words is "guilty and more".

Talk about your Dunning Krugger effect. You are FOS.
Click to expand...
Just one “g” in Kruger. Seth Abramson doesn’t “think” Trump colluded, he cites a few thousand sources proving that he did. I’m pretty sure you haven’t read the books, but let’s connect after you do. Standing by...
 
#12,554
#12,554
0nelilreb said:
17 “ mistakes” in 9 months from hand picked teams , one of the most high profile cases in the FBI history ? Not buying it . Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like but after this IG report and testimony, I’m not going to be alone . I’m not following any journalist . I’m not reading any books , don’t care about spin . Let’s see what comes out in the wash .
Click to expand...
“I’m not reading any books” may be a bad starting point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#12,555
#12,555
Stoerner Fumbles said:
“I’m not reading any books” may be a bad starting point.
Click to expand...

You avoiding the IGs report / testimony and instead trying to get people to read your recommended book as proof of something , is not just a bad starting point , it’s a horrible starting point .
 
#12,557
#12,557
Stoerner Fumbles said:
Just one “g” in Kruger. Seth Abramson doesn’t “think” Trump colluded, he cites a few thousand sources proving that he did. I’m pretty sure you haven’t read the books, but let’s connect after you do. Standing by...
Click to expand...

You can stand by all freakin day for all I care. So Trump supporters are conspiracists, but you are not because you believe a book by a conspiracist, who has information that a 2 year $40M investigation did not uncover? Right on brother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#12,558
#12,558
Mick said:
He doesn't watch or read the news, so it's no wonder why he tries to argue some bastardized version of events.
Click to expand...

You are welcome to refute them Mick . I’m also still waiting on that proof where you called me out on fake news . Hey you could knock out both with one stone here , just prove the IG wrong . Lol
 
#12,559
#12,559
0nelilreb said:
You are welcome to refute them Mick . I’m also still waiting on that proof where you called me out on fake news . Hey you could knock out both with one stone here , just prove the IG wrong . Lol
Click to expand...
That's the thing they are straw arguments with misleading or outright false foundations.

0nelilreb said:
Think about how weak one must be in order to sacrifice his or her income , savings , family security because they allowed themselves to become politically bias to a point of falsifying information in a job that requires / demands you to be honest and neutral in your investigations .
Are you going to hold the Dems in the house and Senate to that same standard when they vote No on impeachment and removal , or we just going to chalk that up to .. duh they have to in order to same their seat ?
Click to expand...

0nelilreb said:
When hate ,loathing , and political bias interfere with your ability to do your job, live your life or push you to the point of irrational thought . It’s not the person you are hating that is the problem . We are seeing this play out in at least one of our ICs . Being the eternal skeptic that I am , I don’t believe the FBI was the only one either . I’ll never believe that Clapper and MCCain wasn’t neck deep in this also .
Click to expand...

Are you just trolling or do you have anything to backup these weak foundations. They told you to wait on Durham for that, because nothing out thus far comes close to your assertion.
 
Last edited:
#12,560
#12,560
Mick said:
That's the thing they are straw arguments in the form of questions with misleading or outright false foundations.
Click to expand...

So in other words you can’t prove either one of your allegations that you made ? You make a lot of noise, you just don’t produce when it’s time . Let me guess you work in a government job don’t you ?
 
#12,561
#12,561
Mick said:
That's the thing they are straw arguments with misleading or outright false foundations.





Are you just trolling or do you have anything to backup these weak foundations. They told you to wait on Durham for that, because nothing out thus far comes close to your assertion.
Click to expand...

Did the IG say that nobody that touched this is exonerated? Did he already find that a lawyer that works in the FBI changed the email from the CIA to say that Carter Page was NOT an asset so they could use it against him ?
 
#12,569
#12,569
The report clearly stated that there were errors and mistakes, but no bias. If Clinesmith altered an email about Page, he should be punished. It won't change the conclusion of the report, nor will it prove a pattern in a two year investigation. As for Abramson, I really do encourage you to read the book(s) before judging them. They are meticulously researched, footnoted, and impeccably organized. I am going out on a limb in assuming you aren't a researcher, an academic or a prosecutor, but if you were any of those things, you could take these facts to the bank. They all lead back to footnoted sources that can (each) be independently verified. Good stuff.
 
#12,570
#12,570
What Horowitz said in the Senate killed the whole there was no FISA abuse argument and destroyed any credibility Comey had left at the same time . Now we wait and see what’s next .
 
#12,571
#12,571
Stoerner Fumbles said:
The report clearly stated that there were errors and mistakes, but no bias. If Clinesmith altered an email about Page, he should be punished. It won't change the conclusion of the report, nor will it prove a pattern in a two year investigation. As for Abramson, I really do encourage you to read the book(s) before judging them. They are meticulously researched, footnoted, and impeccably organized. I am going out on a limb in assuming you aren't a researcher, an academic or a prosecutor, but if you were any of those things, you could take these facts to the bank. They all lead back to footnoted sources that can (each) be independently verified. Good stuff.
Click to expand...

Wrong 17 “ mistakes” and falsifying information is an abuse . This is the FBI, they are the best of the best . Three teams were hand picked to investigate this from the best , no way in hades they make 17 mistakes all leaning one direction in 9 months . Not buying that BS
 
#12,572
#12,572
0nelilreb said:
Did the IG say that nobody that touched this is exonerated? Did he already find that a lawyer that works in the FBI changed the email from the CIA to say that Carter Page was NOT an asset so they could use it against him ?
Click to expand...
True, Page was an asset for the government as some point. Is that gounds to invalidate the FISA ? Nope per the IG. Did the IG conclude his actions were because of political bias? Nope. Just curious what punishment you would like to see for altering an official government communication?
 
#12,573
#12,573
Mick said:
True, Page was an asset for the government as some point. Is that gounds to invalidate the FISA? Nope per the IG. Did the IG conclude his actions were because of political bias? Nope. Just curious what punishment you would like to see for altering an official government communication?
Click to expand...

I would like for my ICs to be honest , fair , not lie to us , create or alter information , to be neutral , without a political bias when investigating anything that the DOJ determines needs to be investigated . You can’t do the opposite of any of those things especially when investigating one of the highest profile case of their careers then tell me it was all just mistakes . Their first and foremost job as the highest law enforcement agencies in the land is to maintain integrity. They failed , p!ssed down our backs , and told us not to worry it’s just rain .
 
#12,574
#12,574
Stoerner Fumbles said:
The report clearly stated that there were errors and mistakes, but no bias. If Clinesmith altered an email about Page, he should be punished. It won't change the conclusion of the report, nor will it prove a pattern in a two year investigation. As for Abramson, I really do encourage you to read the book(s) before judging them. They are meticulously researched, footnoted, and impeccably organized. I am going out on a limb in assuming you aren't a researcher, an academic or a prosecutor, but if you were any of those things, you could take these facts to the bank. They all lead back to footnoted sources that can (each) be independently verified. Good stuff.
Click to expand...
Horowitz didn’t say “no bias”

 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top