SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 52,455
- Likes
- 65,198
It's killing Pat forde we didn't get hit worse he wrote an article about it lol. Why does he hate UT so bad?
Take the buyout money Fulmer stole from the school and pay the fine with that.
Hope that good for nothing egomaniac is never allowed at another athletic event again
Good Point. I wondered also.I'd like to know who also. And why the wife got off scot-free.
Plowman had no choice but to report what she had been presented with to the NCAA. A member of the staff gave her undeniable proof of players being paid. If she tells him to keep his mouth shut and he goes to the NCAA Committee on Infractions with what he has ... her career is ruined.Honest question, was it worth it?
You did not have to pay off Pruitt, and $8 million and no bowl ban is the best you could probably hope for. However, the NCAA is toothless and basically admitted they would not have known if you had not told them. However, there is value in coming clean and knowing it is over.
The scholarship loss can be spread over many years, but the recruiting restrictions are fairly significant.
The penalty for 200 violations including 18 level one is light, but would there have any penalty if you had not self-reported?
As long as the team is winning, those restrictions are manageable. It does place a high emphasis on player evaluation though ... and only recruiting players we have a good chance of landing. We can't be taking official visits from, or doing in-home visits with, long shot 5 star players from Arizona.Imo, a one year bowl ban would have been better than all those recruiting penalties. Those will hurt, especially visits
Whomever blew the whistle wasn’t going to follow up if Plowman ignores what landed on her desk? Anyone who follows history knows the fit hits the shan way worse after a COVERUP. And if the NCAA didn’t put in their dentures, the SEC’s choppers are always sharp.Honest question, was it worth it?
You did not have to pay off Pruitt, and $8 million and no bowl ban is the best you could probably hope for. However, the NCAA is toothless and basically admitted they would not have known if you had not told them. However, there is value in coming clean and knowing it is over.
The scholarship loss can be spread over many years, but the recruiting restrictions are fairly significant.
The penalty for 200 violations including 18 level one is light, but would there have any penalty if you had not self-reported?
Thank you. I did not know that. That certainly explains why Tennessee had to report.Plowman had no choice but to report what she had been presented with to the NCAA. A member of the staff gave her undeniable proof of players being paid. If she tells him to keep his mouth shut and he goes to the NCAA Committee on Infractions with what he has ... her career is ruined.
Yes. How much does the Vols make on a post season game? Almost enough to pay the "fine". Look ,the NCAA just shook the Vols down , play the post-season game, dont hurt the athletes...but show us da money!....Pruitt will never get paid. To bad there is no way to go after Cornbread for the $8 million.Honest question, was it worth it?
You did not have to pay off Pruitt, and $8 million and no bowl ban is the best you could probably hope for. However, the NCAA is toothless and basically admitted they would not have known if you had not told them. However, there is value in coming clean and knowing it is over.
The scholarship loss can be spread over many years, but the recruiting restrictions are fairly significant.
The penalty for 200 violations including 18 level one is light, but would there have any penalty if you had not self-reported?