New Biden Nuclear Hire Is Drag Queen Who Wears Stilettos to Work, Discusses Sex With Animals, And Calls NIH Chief ‘Daddy Fauci’.

[norrislakevol]

Not my point. My point is, Biden has nothing to do with is hiring. The thread title and many, many posts herein are premised on the notion he did.

I'd say you're right. The person actually in charge behind the scenes probably hired it. Probably that butt-ugly Susan Rice.

 

[happy-go_vol]

Don't forget Trump has megalomania and Biden has dementia and acute stupidity. But then they, and Lincoln and Churchill, ain't all that great. BTW Churchill's alcohol consumption was off the charts.

Lincoln was a,bad president, he was not a fan of the constitution

 

[happy-go_vol]

You're probably right, Biden doesn't know what day of the week it is much less what alphabet has been added to his administration

Right, Biden hasn't done anything in his regime, except rubber stamp to whatever Obama or Rice tell him to

 

[davethevol]

Right, Biden hasn't done anything in his regime, except rubber stamp to whatever Obama or Rice tell him to

Let’s not leave Valerie Jarrett out of this.

 

[Sea Ray]

So what? Judge not, lest you be judged, right?

He holds masters in Engineering and Nuclear Science and Engineering from MIT.

Seems like qualifications that would be relevant to a job as a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition in the Office of Nuclear Energy for the Department of Energy.

Your article focused on kink shaming him, not his qualifications... Got anything that say's he's incompetent or otherwise unqualified?

Recent events would suggest that it takes more than an MIT degree to qualify as a good hire. This guy "has issues". His appearance is a big red flag, to say the least

 

[Sea Ray]

Not my point. My point is, Biden has nothing to do with is hiring. The thread title and many, many posts herein are premised on the notion he did.

He's ultimately responsible for every hire in his administration. He can certainly fire this drag queen and anyone responsible for the hire. Since he's doing none of that, yeah, he's responsible

 

[Septic]

Recent events would suggest that it takes more than an MIT degree to qualify as a good hire. This guy "has issues". His appearance is a big red flag, to say the least

I didn't say it was a "good" hire. I suggested that his Masters in engineering and nuclear science qualified him for the position for which he was hired.

 

[Sea Ray]

I didn't say it was a "good" hire. I suggested that his Masters in engineering and nuclear science qualified him for the position for which he was hired.

If that's your reply then you missed the point. The post right before yours:

Is he the best you can get would be the proper question.

He clearly is not that and that's on Biden and others in his admin

 

[Septic]

Recent events would suggest that it takes more than an MIT degree to qualify as a good hire. This guy "has issues". His appearance is a big red flag, to say the least

I didn't say it was a "good" hire. I suggested that his Masters in engineering and nuclear science qualified him for the position for which he was hired.

If that's your reply then you missed the point.

I'd ask that you define "best" - if appearances are a part of the "the best" equation - then perhaps he isn't. Though some may disagree. If education, skill and ability define the "best" for a position of which the education, skill and ability or experience are relevant - then his appearance may be irrelevant.

 

[Sea Ray]

I didn't say it was a "good" hire. I suggested that his Masters in engineering and nuclear science qualified him for the position for which he was hired.




I'd ask that you define "best" - if appearances are a part of the "the best" equation - then perhaps he isn't. Though some may disagree. If education, skill and ability define the "best" for a position of which the education, skill and ability or experience are relevant - then his appearance may be irrelevant.

That's what the interview is all about. As it turns out this guy has a problem with judgment. As an interviewer I would have seen that from the get go. But that's all old news now. We now know that this guy is a bad hire. We should expect more from our 6 figure fed gov't employees.

In the future we ought to do better than "qualified" when hiring

 

[LadyVolette]

That's what the interview is all about. As it turns out this guy has a problem with judgment. As an interviewer I would have seen that from the get go. But that's all old news now. We now know that this guy is a bad hire. We should expect more from our 6 figure fed gov't employees.

In the future we ought to do better than "qualified" when hiring

As someone who has actually hired people in the past the old ‘appearances shouldn’t matter’ thing is crap… we do disqualify people who look unprofessional, especially if they are dealing with public in any capacity.. it’s just the way it works.. sorry, appearances DO matter.. maybe not so if you work at Starbucks or something, so that’s maybe where they should work.. get freaky on your own time

 

[hog88]

As someone who has actually hired people in the past the old ‘appearances shouldn’t matter’ thing is crap… we do disqualify people who look unprofessional, especially if they are dealing with public in any capacity.. it’s just the way it works.. sorry, appearances DO matter.. maybe not so if you work at Starbucks or something, so that’s maybe where they should work

Appearance absolutely matters in the position you are hiring for. I'm not hiring someone with a neck/face tattoo or excessive piercings for an outside sales or CSR position but for a driver/tech/equipment operator sure.

 

[hndog609]

That's what the interview is all about. As it turns out this guy has a problem with judgment. As an interviewer I would have seen that from the get go. But that's all old news now. We now know that this guy is a bad hire. We should expect more from our 6 figure fed gov't employees.

In the future we ought to do better than "qualified" when hiring

For anyone putting a quark's worth of thought into the process "qualified" is the ground floor starting point.

 

[LadyVolette]

Appearance absolutely matters in the position you are hiring for. I'm not hiring someone with a neck/face tattoo or excessive piercings for an outside sales or CSR position but for a driver/tech/equipment operator sure.

Now, in healthcare if they cover these things up when they are coming to work and can present themselves professionally and not be a distraction for everyone, that is a different story.. but from my experience how people show up to the interview is typically their best.. so dial it back about forty degrees and that’s what you are going to get well groomed, took a bath, washed your hair, brushed your teeth, not super look at me look at me! Those are not unreasonable expectations lol

 

[Grand Vol]

Now, in healthcare if they cover these things up when they are coming to work and can present themselves professionally and not be a distraction for everyone, that is a different story.. but from my experience how people show up to the interview is typically their best.. so dial it back about forty degrees and that’s what you are going to get well groomed, took a bath, washed your hair, brushed your teeth, not super look at me look at me! Those are not unreasonable expectations lol

What about a guy who didn't iron his tie?

 

[hog88]

What about a guy who didn't iron his tie?

If you show up in suit and tie to interview with me you don't have a chance.

 

[LadyVolette]

What about a guy who didn't iron his tie?

No tie is fine lol ps I haven’t seen any suits and ties in about twenty years, even executive positions lol .. you can still look professional though

 

[Sea Ray]

For anyone putting a quark's worth of thought into the process "qualified" is the ground floor starting point.

Yep, this bit about "qualified" is bunk. That might be true if you're hiring " a body" to do a menial job but positions like this one need to go much further than qualified.

 

[Ttucke11]

I'd ask that you define "best" - if appearances are a part of the "the best" equation - then perhaps he isn't. Though some may disagree. If education, skill and ability define the "best" for a position of which the education, skill and ability or experience are relevant - then his appearance may be irrelevant.

I'd question there decision making skills right off the bat. I mean did you even see that atrocious romper?

 

[illumiVOLi]

Not my point. My point is, Biden has nothing to do with is hiring. The thread title and many, many posts herein are premised on the notion he did.

Yes he does. This “thing” is a reflection of his administration. Don’t bury your head in the sand you absolute fool.

 

[Sea Ray]

Here's the ironic thing, he's not doing these minorities any favors by hiring these embarrassments. Examples: Kamala Harris and Karine Jean-Pierre. These aren't exactly Jackie Robinson hires to represent their minority.

 

[ButchPlz]

As someone who has actually hired people in the past the old ‘appearances shouldn’t matter’ thing is crap… we do disqualify people who look unprofessional, especially if they are dealing with public in any capacity.. it’s just the way it works.. sorry, appearances DO matter.. maybe not so if you work at Starbucks or something, so that’s maybe where they should work.. get freaky on your own time

If you can't be trusted to reasonably maintain your appearance, and make smart decisions about your appearance (which is EASY), then you don't belong making decisions anywhere. That goes doubly so if you have severe mental illness and delusions about reality.

 

[illumiVOLi]

Here's the ironic thing, he's not doing these minorities any favors by hiring these embarrassments. Examples: Kamala Harris and Karine Jean-Pierre. These aren't exactly Jackie Robinson hires to represent their minority.

Biden is all about the window dressing. Qualifications be damned. As long as your are a clueless minority or tuck your sack back your in.

 

[Allvols1996]

Did Biden "pick" this guy or did he answer an ad and get the job?

Biden is locked away playing with coloring books. He isn’t making any of these decisions.

 

[C-south]

So disqualifying criteria is whether someone might cross a line given the right circumstance?

Having mentally competent people in these positions should be the first criteria.