New mexico allows killing babies

#301
#301
BigOrangeTrain said:
Feel proud you feel that way. I don’t care. IMO you are a sorry excuse for a human being.
Click to expand...

Hey, remember that time you got ran off the plane because you suspected a brown passenger might be a muzzy?

Good times.
 
#302
#302
Rickyvol77 said:
There are living human beings who don’t feel pain, who have no self awareness of reality or themselves. Or are in comas. That are fully alive but not “sentient”. It’s stupid to classify these people as “not alive”
Click to expand...

Again, “alive” or “life” and a “person” are different. If everything that makes you who you are is no different than just a biological body then there is no use carrying on the conversation. That is a dogma that I can’t lower my IQ enough to believe.

If there is even a 1% chance they will come back, then absolutely, keep them going.

If it is 0%, then I argue it is cruel to keep them alive. Let them pass. The person is dead. I would think even religion and science would agree on that one.

Get off the moral high horse and pleas to emotion. Just for once, rationally think about what you are saying here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic and 82_VOL_83
#303
#303
luthervol said:
Simple....I'm going to type it slowly for you......read carefully.
It is a nine month old living fetus that is more human than an 8 month old living fetus and less human than a one month old living human.

Now your turn.....for the fourth time.
Are a five year old and a zygote equally human?
Click to expand...

“More human” wasn’t your original claim. Your original was the one I’ve posted repeatedly where you said a “living human” is a person born and alive. Now you’re shifting to “more human less human”. So address your original claim, explain scientifically how a 9 month old in the womb is not “living” or “human”. Don’t make claims if you don’t want to or don’t have the ability to defend or back up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#304
#304
luthervol said:
By definition, a nine month old in the womb is an unborn fetus.
I have said REPEATEDLY it is more human than an 8 month old fetus and less human than a one month old baby.

Your turn. Is a five year old and a zygote equally human? Spacecoast can jump in with an answer also, if he's so moved.
Click to expand...

Nah. You continue to deflect. Besides, you have already demonstrated what a vile person you are. I'd call you a vile human, but i have my doubts as to your humanity. You are more akin to a real Nazi. If it offends you, killing it is ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and Rickyvol77
#305
#305
luthervol said:
Feel free to answer the question that no one else will answer.

It seems as if I answer all of the questions from you guys yet you answer none of mine. Odd.
Click to expand...
I wonder how you'd feel if one of your liberal daughters told you that she had her baby killed right before giving birth. Actually i don't. For filth like you, it would be an 'adult' decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#306
#306
615vols said:
“More human” wasn’t your original claim. Your original was the one I’ve posted repeatedly where you said a “living human” is a person born and alive. Now you’re shifting to “more human less human”. So address your original claim, explain scientifically how a 9 month old in the womb is not “living” or “human”. Don’t make claims if you don’t want to or don’t have the ability to defend or back up.
Click to expand...
He meant 3/5 of a human
 
  • Like
Reactions: 615vols
#308
#308
615vols said:
Of course. He made an idiotic claim, shifted to another idiotic claim, and doesn’t answer to either because he knows he logically can’t. Meanwhile he claims he’s answered everything 😂
Click to expand...
That’s why he speaks in “continuums” because he knows he can’t defend actual concrete stuff he believes
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123 and 615vols
#309
#309
615vols said:
“More human” wasn’t your original claim. Your original was the one I’ve posted repeatedly where you said a “living human” is a person born and alive. Now you’re shifting to “more human less human”. So address your original claim, explain scientifically how a 9 month old in the womb is not “living” or “human”. Don’t make claims if you don’t want to or don’t have the ability to defend or back up.
Click to expand...
What a crock.
I've answered it multiple times, whereas you've not even attempted an answer at mine.
Tells everyone what they need to know.
Now once again.........sloooooooooooooowly.
One is a living human while the other is a living fetus. By definition.

I'll try larger font and bolding.
A 9 month old fetus is more human than an 8 month old fetus but less human than a one month old baby.

Your turn. Do you believe a 5 year old and a zygote are equally human? (5th time)
 
#311
#311
luthervol said:
What a stupid question.
Click to expand...
What is stupid about it? And fwiw it wasn't a question Mr Bus Driver. It was an observation.

And thanks for the answer you provided in the next post. You would be absolutely OK if your daughter killed her 'living fetus' right before giving birth. You are some kind of special.
 
#312
#312
luthervol said:
What a crock.
I've answered it multiple times, whereas you've not even attempted an answer at mine.
Tells everyone what they need to know.
Now once again.........sloooooooooooooowly.
One is a living human while the other is a living fetus. By definition.

I'll try larger font and bolding.
A 9 month old fetus is more human than an 8 month old fetus but less human than a one month old baby.

Your turn. Do you believe a 5 year old and a zygote are equally human? (5th time)
Click to expand...
I'll play. No they aren't.

Edit:

Wait. I re-read your answer. So is it OK in your brain to kill a 'living fetus'?
 
#315
#315
SpaceCoastVol said:
But you are also OK as using it for birth control. Despicable.
Click to expand...
Abortion is, by definition, birth control. A terminated pregnancy prevents a birth whether for medical reasons or social reasons.

As I linked earlier, Israel.... an ally the US provides billions of dollars in essentially unrestricted aid.... funds abortion up to the point of birth. Israel approves 98% of all requested abortions and funds them for women under 33 and above 45, I think it is.

Why are we giving money to this country? Who supports that?

Edited: In Israel, the fetus has no rights until crowning or the umbilical cord is cut.

https://www.beadchaim.com/article/abortion-in-israel
 
#316
#316
SayUWantAreVOLution said:
Abortion is, by definition, birth control. A terminated pregnancy prevents a birth whether for medical reasons or social reasons.

As I linked earlier, Israel.... an ally the US provides billions of dollars in essentially unrestricted aid.... funds abortion up to the point of birth. Israel approves 98% of all requested abortions and funds them for women under 33 and above 45, I think it is.

Why are we giving money to this country? Who supports that?

Edited: In Israel, the fetus has no rights until crowning or the umbilical cord is cut.

https://www.beadchaim.com/article/abortion-in-israel
Click to expand...

What happens in Israel has no bearing on what happens here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#317
#317
SayUWantAreVOLution said:
Abortion is, by definition, birth control. A terminated pregnancy prevents a birth whether for medical reasons or social reasons.

As I linked earlier, Israel.... an ally the US provides billions of dollars in essentially unrestricted aid.... funds abortion up to the point of birth. Israel approves 98% of all requested abortions and funds them for women under 33 and above 45, I think it is.

Why are we giving money to this country? Who supports that?

Edited: In Israel, the fetus has no rights until crowning or the umbilical cord is cut.

https://www.beadchaim.com/article/abortion-in-israel
Click to expand...
Who cares what Israel does?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#319
#319
BigOrangeTrain said:
What happens in Israel has no bearing on what happens here.
Click to expand...
Oddly, we send them SEVERAL BILLION in aid which allows them to fund domestic programs like abortion easily.

The logic of not funding Planned Parenthood, even though it's illegal for govt funding for them to be used for abortions, is that "if you fund something else, that allows them to use money for abortions."

Why doesn't that apply to Israel? Should we support them or not?
 
#320
#320
SayUWantAreVOLution said:
We send them about $3.3 BILLION dollars in aid each year. Do you want to support a govt that funds abortion up to birth????

Who supports that kind of govt? We shouldn't.
Click to expand...
They don’t use that money for abortions. Quit being ridiculous. They use it for defensive purposes.
 
#321
#321
Rickyvol77 said:
They don’t use that money for abortions. Quit being ridiculous. They use it for defensive purposes.
Click to expand...
And that allows them money to fund domestic programs, like abortion.

It's ILLEGAL for Planned Parenthood to use govt money for abortions, so it would be okay to fund them since they can't?

Why is the logic different for Israel? Why should we let them have the money for defense so they can use other money for disgusting abortions?

It's the same logic. If you give them money for defense, it allows them more money for abortion funding. Easy and obvious logic, as applied to Planned Parenthood.
 
#324
#324
Rickyvol77 said:
They don’t use that money for abortions. Quit being ridiculous. They use it for defensive purposes.
Click to expand...
Just look at the DISGUSTING treatment of stillborn and young deceased infants. Mass graves and the family cannot mourn nor even know the location.

I BELIEVE Israel has modified this, but it was their disgusting practice at least until about 2013.

How can we support a country like this in ANY WAY?

New procedure allows parents to bury stillborn babies
 
#325
#325
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top