New Nationwide Lockdown Coming?

Would you listen to our government and comply with a lockdown?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 27 20.3%
  • No.

    Votes: 91 68.4%
  • Maybe.

    Votes: 15 11.3%

  • Total voters
    133
Well, I could give a billion dollars to the family of criminals to *try* to bail them out, but does that actually free them?

Nope.

That's up to a judge. So, if anyone bailed out that is dangerous... that falls on a judge.
Yes.... most criminals get bail unless it is a capital murder case..... so you are completely fine with Biden/Harris supporting bail for these criminals that are destroying their communities.
 
Yes.... most criminals get bail unless it is a capital murder case..... so you are completely fine with Biden/Harris supporting bail for these criminals that are destroying their communities.

So you don't support the bail system? I mean, this system applies to white collar crimes, too, eh.
 
71D1A76E-649C-4236-8FFA-25D7708185A6.gif

Me watching you guys trying to argue logic with a sheep so afraid of a virus with a 99% survival rate that it ran from one state to another to get away from it . You can’t convince a whackadoodle that’s afraid of something using logic and common sense .
 
Last edited:
View attachment 323324

Me watching you guys trying to argue logic with a sheep so afraid of a virus with a 99% survival rate that it ran from one state to another to get away from it . You can’t convince a whatadoodle that’s that afraid of something using logic and common sense .
After MP's comments on national death rates, I'm going to have to refrain from posting during the work day. I can't handle this level of ignorance.
 
Iowa governor, who disparaged mask mandates as ‘feel-good’ measures, reverses course

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) announced a statewide mask mandate on Monday, months after dismissing such orders as “feel-good” measures with little impact. Coronavirus infections in the state have doubled over the past month, and the number of hospitalized patients reached a new high on Monday.

Stricter public health orders are also being imposed in Philadelphia, New Jersey, Oklahoma and California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said the state needed to slam the “emergency brake” on reopening.
 
During a Federalist Society speech last night, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito called attention to the legal issues raised by the sweeping social and economic restrictions that all but a few states imposed this year in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. "The pandemic has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty," Alito noted in his remarks, which he delivered via Zoom. "We have never before seen restrictions as severe, extensive, and prolonged as those experienced for most of 2020."

Justice Samuel Alito Highlights the Legal Issues Raised by 'Previously Unimaginable' COVID-19 Restrictions
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
This is a serious topic. Will you at least try to stop jacking off?
CRneZn1UYAAcsyS.jpg
 
SCIENCE!

100,000 less people die if we use masks.

Repeat... 100,000 people. That's 33-times more people than died in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States
Nature Medicine (2020)Cite this article
Abstract
We use COVID-19 case and mortality data from 1 February 2020 to 21 September 2020 and a deterministic SEIR (susceptible, exposed, infectious and recovered) compartmental framework to model possible trajectories of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States at the state level from 22 September 2020 through 28 February 2021. Using this SEIR model, and projections of critical driving covariates (pneumonia seasonality, mobility, testing rates and mask use per capita), we assessed scenarios of social distancing mandates and levels of mask use. Projections of current non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies by state—with social distancing mandates reinstated when a threshold of 8 deaths per million population is exceeded (reference scenario)—suggest that, cumulatively, 511,373 (469,578–578,347) lives could be lost to COVID-19 across the United States by 28 February 2021. We find that achieving universal mask use (95% mask use in public) could be sufficient to ameliorate the worst effects of epidemic resurgences in many states. Universal mask use could save an additional 129,574 (85,284–170,867) lives from September 22, 2020 through the end of February 2021, or an additional 95,814 (60,731–133,077) lives assuming a lesser adoption of mask wearing (85%), when compared to the reference scenario.
DE038C54-26A9-42D3-9CCA-FDF58A08851E.gif
 
The governor of NC can’t protest in a mass group without a mask and then get on tv and tell us to wear one.

“If the lockdown worked the first time why do we need another one” OR “If it didn’t work the first time why do we need another”
 
Get used to lock downs in the new Communist America, comrade

8 weeks and good people who have done everything they can to stay afloat are about to lose it all... again.

If Joe and his gang of misfits don’t have a fool proof plan to get the small businesses and the people through this then I can’t wait to say I told you so to all the people who bitched about the way Trump handled it.
 
8 weeks and good people who have done everything they can to stay afloat are about to lose it all... again.

If Joe and his gang of misfits don’t have a fool proof plan to get the small businesses and the people through this then I can’t wait to say I told you so to all the people who bitched about the way Trump handled it.
They have no plan other than

1605719466950.png
 

VN Store



Back
Top