jakez4ut
Patience... It's what's for dinner
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 71,417
- Likes
- 128,582
the more i think about this thread and the post that originated, the dumber it all starts to look to me.
a) in regards to recruiting rankings, his platform is that coaching stability does not lead to better recruiting over time, yet he uses only a 5 year time span, and then uses a subset of that time span to prove the point. ridiculous. Over time, stability does reap some benefit. if you want proof, go back a little further in the recruiting rankings and see how we did when LSU was going thru the mike archers and gerry dinardos of the world or GA was going thru Ray Goff and Jim Donnan etc....my stance would be coaching changes in and of itself have no positive bearing on recruiting unless.........
b)you get the right frickin coach. the changes BAma, LSU and FL made all made positive impacts because of the coaches they hired. not changing coaches all together. the premise he laid out for us may be correct, but for the wrong reason. hence why it's dumb.
c) playing kids early. load of crap. all of the examples he's laid out are fine well and good.....for the SHORT TERM. but let's see how a true freshman competes and plays in lieu of Percy Harvin or Tim Tebow or some of the other guys that are now going to be JR's and SR's the next few years. as Meyer and Saban bring in their personnel, their teams will get older by default. the reason MOST COACHES play older, veteran players is that generally, they are BETTER. in FL' s case, which is the exception, no the rule, Meyer has been playing all these kids early because he basically had to. he needed players to fit his system. which automatically opened up competition to the newcomers. Good for him, it's worked out well. but next year and going forward, i'd be willing to bet you'll see less and less Tr Fr starting for the Gators in favor of the kids he's recruited the last couple of years......who by the way have been part of top 3 classes........the same will be true of Saban and Bama.
c)national recruiting comparison against FSU and PSU. hm. would anyone really debate whether or not Pennsylvania or Florida had a little more in state talent to work with than Tennessee? didn't think so. next.
d) this whole thing reads like some manifesto of someone that needs convincing that CPF has just lost it and must go.
he may need to go, but the rhetoric put forth here ain't the reason why. and if this is your new battle cry for Fire Fulmer or is what puts you over the edge on the debate, then i'm just sorry for you.
there are plenty of tangible, on the field competition driven reasons, that are not worth listing here, as to why Fulmer may need to go. and that is, at the end of the day, all that matters.
the rest of this garbage is just semantics and window dressing.
a) in regards to recruiting rankings, his platform is that coaching stability does not lead to better recruiting over time, yet he uses only a 5 year time span, and then uses a subset of that time span to prove the point. ridiculous. Over time, stability does reap some benefit. if you want proof, go back a little further in the recruiting rankings and see how we did when LSU was going thru the mike archers and gerry dinardos of the world or GA was going thru Ray Goff and Jim Donnan etc....my stance would be coaching changes in and of itself have no positive bearing on recruiting unless.........
b)you get the right frickin coach. the changes BAma, LSU and FL made all made positive impacts because of the coaches they hired. not changing coaches all together. the premise he laid out for us may be correct, but for the wrong reason. hence why it's dumb.
c) playing kids early. load of crap. all of the examples he's laid out are fine well and good.....for the SHORT TERM. but let's see how a true freshman competes and plays in lieu of Percy Harvin or Tim Tebow or some of the other guys that are now going to be JR's and SR's the next few years. as Meyer and Saban bring in their personnel, their teams will get older by default. the reason MOST COACHES play older, veteran players is that generally, they are BETTER. in FL' s case, which is the exception, no the rule, Meyer has been playing all these kids early because he basically had to. he needed players to fit his system. which automatically opened up competition to the newcomers. Good for him, it's worked out well. but next year and going forward, i'd be willing to bet you'll see less and less Tr Fr starting for the Gators in favor of the kids he's recruited the last couple of years......who by the way have been part of top 3 classes........the same will be true of Saban and Bama.
c)national recruiting comparison against FSU and PSU. hm. would anyone really debate whether or not Pennsylvania or Florida had a little more in state talent to work with than Tennessee? didn't think so. next.
d) this whole thing reads like some manifesto of someone that needs convincing that CPF has just lost it and must go.
he may need to go, but the rhetoric put forth here ain't the reason why. and if this is your new battle cry for Fire Fulmer or is what puts you over the edge on the debate, then i'm just sorry for you.
there are plenty of tangible, on the field competition driven reasons, that are not worth listing here, as to why Fulmer may need to go. and that is, at the end of the day, all that matters.
the rest of this garbage is just semantics and window dressing.