New York City

#201
#201
evillawyer said:
Other than free Pre-K 4 (daycare costs north of $2500/month), I can't point to anything he did that anybody likes.
Click to expand...
I was there 1 year ago almost to the day. It struck me then how bad and nasty the place had gotten. My family will no longer go into the city. It’s really that bad now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, marcusluvsvols and StarRaider
#203
#203
Illegal Alien Accused of Assault Freed 10 Times by Sanctuary New York City

ICE-NYC-640x480.jpg


Sanctuary New York City has released an illegal alien back into the community ten times over the last two years, despite his long criminal record.

Jhonny Alejandro Soto-Ubaldo, an illegal alien from the Dominican Republic, was first arrested by the New York City Police Department (NYPD) in June 2018. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency placed a detainer on Soto-Ubaldo, but the NYPD release him instead of transferring him to their custody.

Less than two months after his first arrest, Soto-Ubaldo was arrested and released again by the NYPD despite an ICE detainer. Between April and October 2019, Soto-Ubaldo was arrested six times by the NYPD and each time they released him.

This year, in March, Soto-Ubaldo was arrested for unauthorized use of a vehicle and criminal possession of stolen property before getting released by the NYPD. In May, Soto-Ubaldo was arrested for assault and criminal mischief. For the tenth time, the NYPD released Soto-Ubaldo instead of turning him over to ICE.

This month, Soto-Ubaldo was arrested by U.S. Marshals on federal firearm violations. The illegal alien is currently in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and, if he is released at any time, he will be turned over to ICE for arrest and deportation.

“What makes this case so frustrating is that local law enforcement failed to honor 10 detainers, despite Soto-Ubaldo’s lengthy criminal history,” ICE official Thomas Decker said. “How can local politicians — in good conscience — say they’re protecting their constituents when they pass laws that release criminals back into our communities?”

Illegal Alien Accused of Assault Freed 10 Times by Sanctuary NYC
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and BreatheUT
#204
#204
Ummm... just to set the record straight, per Trump, DeBlasio's not in charge. It's an "Anarchist Jurisdiction".

By definition, nobody's in charge.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Also: crack.
 
#205
#205
MontyPython said:
Ummm... just to set the record straight, per Trump, DeBlasio's not in charge. It's an "Anarchist Jurisdiction".

By definition, nobody's in charge.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Also: crack.
Click to expand...
LOL, no bud for the pipe? Like a "peace" pipe!
 
#209
#209
SpaceCoastVol said:
How do you do that?
Click to expand...
Mom can collect for one child only then the father get to collect for the rest but she’s gotta get the money from him.....and she only collects for the first child not the first from each father
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#211
#211
Wireless1 said:
Mom can collect for one child only then the father get to collect for the rest but she’s gotta get the money from him.....and she only collects for the first child not the first from each father
Click to expand...
Not quite. My idea is that you only get assistance if you are married... and just on one child. If not married, you get zilch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolFaninFla, marcusluvsvols and Wireless1
#212
#212
Rasputin_Vol said:
Not quite. My idea is that you only get assistance if you are married... and just on one child. If not married, you get zilch.
Click to expand...

I'm in Wirless1 corner on this. I think your position is a little too strong. After one out of wedlock child you get no additional benefits.

Also, low income housing should really be low income housing. Far too often as soon as a low income person works a few extra hours or get a 2nd job their rent goes up immediately or they lose the government assistance immediately so they lose incentive to work extra or get an extra job. I think this is ridiculous. I think there needs to be ranges. If wages don't go up by $5k then no change in rent expense, and maybe they retain government benefits for 6 months. Most of these programs look at every dollar. People need some type of incentive for going back to work but not feeling like there is 0 return if bills go up in the process when they are trying to get off the mat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Wireless1
#214
#214
Rasputin_Vol said:
Not quite. My idea is that you only get assistance if you are married... and just on one child. If not married, you get zilch.
Click to expand...
I could agree with that. OF course I also think that there should only be 2 tax deductions for having children as well... That's enough. Besides, people that are getting ANY deductions for having children are not paying 'their fair share'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolFaninFla and Orangeburst
#215
#215
BreatheUT said:
I'm in Wirless1 corner on this. I think your position is a little too strong. After one out of wedlock child you get no additional benefits.

Also, low income housing should really be low income housing. Far too often as soon as a low income person works a few extra hours or get a 2nd job their rent goes up immediately or they lose the government assistance immediately so they lose incentive to work extra or get an extra job. I think this is ridiculous. I think there needs to be ranges. If wages don't go up by $5k then no change in rent expense, and maybe they retain government benefits for 6 months. Most of these programs look at every dollar. People need some type of incentive for going back to work but not feeling like there is 0 return if bills go up in the process when they are trying to get off the mat.
Click to expand...
That's the problem. We are rewarding the decision to have out of wedlock children.

Also, all assistance ends once the parents divorce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO and Wireless1
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top