BenGrimm
Formally known as burntorangeVOLffle
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 16,021
- Likes
- 10,036
I wouldn't put RHCP in that movement. They were around for years before the grunge scene cropped up. Plus they we're from LA, not Seattle. They also were Funk, not grunge.
Fair enough. but they did help popularize the scene regardless of semantics.
I saw a concert poster the other day: at some point, RHCP, Nirvana, and Pearl Jam played shows together. Can you imagine?
They're breakout album, BSSM, did come out around the same time as Nevermind and the explosion of the grunge scene, so I can see how one might lump them in. I was in middle school at the time and BSSM shirts were a dime a dozen in the halls.
You could probably throw Primus in that group as well but they were anything but grunge. In general most of the people who liked Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and RHCP, would have liked them too.
They should be a first ballot induction, but your second paragraph is severely over the top.
I don't think so. After the Beatles, rock changed forever; they pretty much influenced all bands who followed. You cannot have your Who and Pink Floyd without the Beatles.
30 years later, Nirvana did the same thing; it was a paradigm shift in rock and Nirvana was in the right place at the right time.
I'm not saying nirvana were the most talented or the better songwriters; they were pretty sloppy to be honest.
But you cannot argue that any other band other than the Beatles (maybe Led Zeppelin) had a larger influence on rock than Nirvana!
The Velvet Underground, The Stooges, The Ramones and Black Sabbath had a more significant influence than Nirvana. Heck, Nirvana themselves sprung from the Velvets and the Stooges.
If the Velvets and the Stooges were more influential than Nirvana (as you are suggesting), why didn't the whole rock world change overnight upon their formation?
Both were on the fringe and ahead of their time (as were the Ramones and Sabbath)- all are highly influential but none even got close to Nirvana's impact.
If the Velvets and the Stooges were more influential than Nirvana (as you are suggesting), why didn't the whole rock world change overnight upon their formation?
Both were on the fringe and ahead of their time (as were the Ramones and Sabbath)- all are highly influential but none even got close to Nirvana's impact.
If the Velvets and the Stooges were more influential than Nirvana (as you are suggesting), why didn't the whole rock world change overnight upon their formation?
Both were on the fringe and ahead of their time (as were the Ramones and Sabbath)- all are highly influential but none even got close to Nirvana's impact.
saying nirvana is as infulential as:
The Who
The Doors
Pink Floyd
Queen
The Eagles
Black Sabbath
Bad Company
is laughable. And that's just the seventies/early eighties.