No doubt it's pretty rich for coaches who'll dash for the dough at the drop of a hat to bemoan the lack of loyalty. As the money they chased got more crazy, the more hypocritical they looked denying the poor kids their shirtzee sales.
But probably a little too wild west? And how sweet that you think program stability can be built upon the noble few who stay for love over gold, but please. Also, indentured servitude seems a little extreme. Again, before the crazy money poured in, it was thought the value of the free college education plus the copious gear, treatment like royalty, etc was fair compensation for their services.
We appear to be going down the path in court of no control or restrictions on marketing. I don't see how any transfer portal rules stand in the face of that. Unrestricted pay for play is unleashed every year, Old man me is going to miss college sports as we knew them. I'm sure they'll adjust and survive and get more huge tv contracts but they'll feel very different.
Are there any other sports (yet) where rosters turn over every year? It will be interesting to see what kind of attachments are possible, both players to teams and fans to players. Some stability can be achieved by pay for stay. Agents and accountants will make a killing.
Instead of Vols for Life they'll be Vols for Life of the Contract.