rpvol
Cheers!
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 22,806
- Likes
- 58
Your first statement is correct, the second is not.
The founding fathers were unaimous in their belief that they were building our government based upon Christian principles.
maybe in todays nation, but the notion that this country was built as a christian nation is fact.
what were they gonna write in there? everyone must be christian? they were smart enough not to do that. there are many things that point to christianity in this countrys history. its simple really. you don't like it, don't look at it. its a few angels on a christmas tree and a cross on the side of the road.
and for the record, i am not an extremely religious person, but i hate to see these people like the one that the article is written about make such a mess over trivial things that may being a smile to someone's face or comfort to a family who has tragically lost a loved one.
You're response above was very similar to a line from the character Sheldon in Monday night's rerun episode of The Big Bang Theory, a fairly funny sitcom if you like that sort of thing, although they seldom miss their opportunities to take a shot at Christians.
maybe in todays nation, but the notion that this country was built as a christian nation is fact.
A plain reading of the language of the First Amendment does NOT support the notion that goverment cannot endorse one particular religion over others, only that it cannot "make any law" establishing a religion. However, evidence does exists that supports the notion that both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison - the guy who drafted the Bill of Rights - intended the First Amendment to create a wall between church and state.
If they intended to create a wall, then why has everyone assumed this? Afterall it was only in a letter to the Dansbury Baptist Assoc. which is not the constitution. Everyone uses this one letter to make it part of the constitution but ignore the other letters about their faith. Why one over the other?
I didn't say there was overwhelming
evidence that Madison drafted
the first amendment to separate church and state...only that some evidence exists to support the notion. Also, to imply that people don't share the separationist view is incorrect. A significant number of supreme court justices share that view. Now, I don't agree. My only point was to show one of the reasons for the debate.
A plain reading of the language of the First Amendment does NOT support the notion that goverment cannot endorse one particular religion over others, only that it cannot "make any law" establishing a religion. However, evidence does exists that supports the notion that both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison - the guy who drafted the Bill of Rights - intended the First Amendment to create a wall between church and state.
yeah well I studied the Tao of Pooh so :neener2:
The Madison, Wis.-based Freedom from Religion Foundation has placed the sign in several state Capitol buildings across the country.
Atheist Display At State Capitol
Their sign reads:
"At the time of the winter solstice, let reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is just myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds."
.....Haupt said in addition to the sign, the Nativity Scene and the Christmas tree, there is also a Soldiers' Angels wreath, and a tabletop display from the American Civil Liberties Union that says the group "defends freedom of religion." A Hanukkah menorah had also been on display until the Jewish Festival of Lights ended on Saturday.
Let me guess, its OK for Christmas trees and nativity scenes, but nothing else, or an atheist sign?
First of all, the ACLU is a joke. They defend what fits their purpose (whatever that is, its not all religion conclusive). If a christian takes a bible to school, or has prayer there, (without direction of the school administators) the ACLU goes after the school board.(currently happening in the county I live in)
In some public schools, the pillars of Islam are being taught.
Defending religous freedoms?
I guess that depends on what religion.
As far as Christmas goes, I guess thats why they are currently trying to phase out the name.
Christmas in America is in the process of being prohibited by a public school system that has zero compunction about striking Jell-O from the lunch menu to placate pork sensitivity in Islamic students.
.................................................
Atheists and non-Christians have targeted for eradication any Christmas songs performed in public school holiday plays.
.........................................
A White House that celebrates Ramadan sanctioned putting the kibosh on the holiday spirit by planning an oxymoronic non-religious Christmas.
..............................................
Eliminating depictions of biblical stories and characters does not go far enough for iconoclasts wishing to totally exterminate Christianity from American culture.
.................................................
Wait until these academic geniuses realize that holiday is a compound word stemming from holy and day.
.............................................
With missionary zeal, secularists in the public school system, as well as the highest offices of government, exclude the spiritual and exalt the humanistic.
.....................................
Secular religion has set up church in a godless government stretching from Cherry Creek, Colorado to the White House and disguising its nefarious ambitions as political correctness.
Your first statement is correct, the second is not.
The founding fathers were unaimous in their belief that they were building our government based upon Christian principles.
The founding fathers were as much, if not more, influenced by the works of Locke, Burke, and Voltaire. I am not saying that their Christian beliefs did not influence them, but it certainly was not their only influence.
There are many negatives for being an Atheist in the United States. The very worst is the fact than my fellow Atheists are so thin skinned, *****y, and hostile. I in no way want religious displays removed simply because I do not believe in them. Jesus really is the reason for the season, this cannot be ignored. I just do not understand how a star on a Christmas tree is offensive at all.
I do consider this to be a Christian nation, not because of the founding fathers, but because this is the most devoutly religious Christian nation on earth. Most Americans are Christians, and a majority of them put their faith as the central tenet in their life. We are a Christian nation, this in no way offends me, or worries me. It is what it is.
Merry Christmas Irv Sutley!! May Jack Frost be nipping at your liberal toes.
California County Reverses Ban on Angel, Star Ornaments After Public Outcry - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News - FOXNews.com