While we're at the break...
A little rant here about the media and its effects on the game. First, a disclaimer...Tennessee obviously got a huge advantage in free media coverage during the Summitt era, just as all programs with highly-successful, lionized coaches have done. Being a media darling and box office draw has many perks. And the biggest attraction will always be the hero(ine) vs. villain storyline.
But there are negative perceptions givens that arise, too. When coaches are fawned upon by the media for so long, they begin to overstep the social constraints and/or rules by which others abide. Poor Holly Rowe was the object lesson twice in one week. First, Calipari puts his hands on both of her shoulders and leaves them there while he's talking to her. Extremely unprofessional and creepy to watch regardless of whatever friendship they may have off-camera. And something you'd probably never see him do with a male interviewer. Then the Auriemma tirade, although I didn't feel that was all that insulting to Rowe. The obligatory in-game interviews (and now absurd warmup interviews with athletes) are silly, but both parties agree to the setup to sell the game. "Keeping it real" and "being yourself" should have limits. Unfortunately, it seems that success buys people a lot of extra leeway and leverage. When the success wanes, so does the privilege (see Myers, Urban). Then it's knives out.
And it's not just the bad behavior that irks me. It's the unbalanced focus. In the very close game between SC and Bama, the tv coverage actually did a split-screen of Staley on the sidelines (doing nothing particularly noteworthy) and left the camera on her while the game continued on the left. And it stayed and lingered and stayed there for what seemed an eternity. Kristy Curry could have left the building to get a Sonic shake, highlight touchup, and pedicure, and the viewers would never have known.
The same coverage goes for all "celebrity" coaches and athletes. Mulkey, VanDerveer, others will get three times the exposure...free recruiting advertising. And the practice extends to athletes. During our game with conn, we repeatedly saw shots of Bueckers and Fudd sharing some private laughs and convos (even as the game tightened), and the same coverage continued throughout the game. I know tv is a business and celebrity sells, but there is a limit. Frankly, I'm tired of all the "Pat vs. Geno" hype every time we play them even though it's honoring our legend. Pat still gets her share during the We Back Pat week.
I'd like to see more of the Lisa Bluders and Kevin McGuffs and less of the star attractions. There are lots of currently-successful coaches I know nothing about unless I do research and rarely see unless they're deemed photogenic (especially with women coaches). It always happened when Pat was the draw, too, so not sour grapes. It happens with every sport and is to be expected to a degree (five shots of Saban to one of Heupel), but that doesn't make it any less annoying. It's not as though the celebrity coaches and star players aren't going to be seen repeatedly in commercials hawking insurance and slides.
Old man yelling at cloud rant over.
[Edited to fix about 40 misspellings]