Why would you want her not to score 30 if you have other players taking shots at a much lower percentage and low efficiency. That doesn't make much sense at all.
Because you build a championship caliber team by building depth and spreading it around so if one goes down they are not impacted as much. Another important reason is that in order for a team to be consistently good, they cannot be predictable and do the same thing over and over, and in that light a good coach does not put too much of the teams success on any one player when possible.
Boston could score 30 many nights if that was the plan, she shoots around 56%, but then you hurt your team by relying too much on one player in the long run. Watch the tourney, if Clark goes for 30 or more most games her teammates are suffering from less shots and they are easier to game plan. If she is off on a given night they are doomed.
By your logic, you let the player with the highest points per attempt shoot all the time. Tell me how well that works for most teams, men’s and women’s, including the pros.
Last season, for UT, Davis had to carry too big of a load. This year it was JH Having to carry too big of a load, ideally it is spread around so no one player dictates the entire team’s success. Having said that, Boston would be a huge loss to SC if injured, obviously. But fatal? I think not based upon the depth they have built by spreading it around.
Haley Jones from Stanford could prob average 20-25 a game if they played to one player. Wonder why they spread it around?
That is not the case with Iowa. If Boston went down, Cardosa, Amihere and Saxton would get extended minutes in and around the post position and their production per minutes played are all high enough to suggest the team‘s wound is not fatal, albeit it would hurt. If Clark goes down, Iowa is done.
That is why you do not ask one player to be the end all of all things on your team. Hell, Boston averages about ten minutes less PT than Clark who rarely comes out. So is Clark the MVP of her team and maybe of WBB, yes. The best player, POY, ? It’s close IMO but I like the SC/Stanford method of running a team as far as trying to go deep in the tourney, more well rounded. I would never argue against Clark as POY If she wins, but man, in the tourney there will be teams that focus on her and let’s see what that looks like as far as wins and losses.