volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,622
Hitler believed in social justice?
"Socal justice" is a code phrase for whatever your enemies want to re-package your politics into.
I mean, I could argue that the tea party's platform of cutting social spending and then taxes for the wealthy is their own brand of "social justice" because it rewards those who work and invest and that is justice.
Essentially this is what bothers me most about the whole Tea Party movement. I was very discouraged when CSpan aired their "convention" and a birther was a keynote speaker. Tired and exaggerated analogies aren't nearly as effective as the singular message that voters refuse to accept taxation without representation. Forget about birth certificates and looney right wing crap. Focus on the economics and the "new taxes" and I guarantee returns in November.
Essentially this is what bothers me most about the whole Tea Party movement. I was very discouraged when CSpan aired their "convention" and a birther was a keynote speaker. Tired and exaggerated analogies aren't nearly as effective as the singular message that voters refuse to accept taxation without representation. Forget about birth certificates and looney right wing crap. Focus on the economics and the "new taxes" and I guarantee returns in November.
"Socal justice" is a code phrase for whatever your enemies want to re-package your politics into.
I mean, I could argue that the tea party's platform of cutting social spending and then taxes for the wealthy is their own brand of "social justice" because it rewards those who work and invest and that is justice.
The number of people who are willing to put together signs and go to a lot of rallies because they are angry about government spending is way small compared to the number that will show up because they see it as a chance to take a cheap swipe and someone they personally dislike, even hate.
The number of people who are willing to put together signs and go to a lot of rallies because they are angry about government spending is way small compared to the number that will show up because they see it as a chance to take a cheap swipe and someone they personally dislike, even hate.
It is in many ways a shame that the tea party -- which in fiscal policy is a movememnt that makes a lot of sense and has a lot to say -- is overrun with the "lonney right wing," as you put it.
I'd wager that, like you, a lot of those who sympathize with tea party policy on taxation and overspending absolutely cringe at billboards like this.
The number of people who are willing to put together signs and go to a lot of rallies because they are angry about government spending is way small compared to the number that will show up because they see it as a chance to take a cheap swipe and someone they personally dislike, even hate.
It is in many ways a shame that the tea party -- which in fiscal policy is a movememnt that makes a lot of sense and has a lot to say -- is overrun with the "lonney right wing," as you put it.
I'd wager that, like you, a lot of those who sympathize with tea party policy on taxation and overspending absolutely cringe at billboards like this.
Essentially this is what bothers me most about the whole Tea Party movement. I was very discouraged when CSpan aired their "convention" and a birther was a keynote speaker. Tired and exaggerated analogies aren't nearly as effective as the singular message that voters refuse to accept taxation without representation. Forget about birth certificates and looney right wing crap. Focus on the economics and the "new taxes" and I guarantee returns in November.
I agree but political movements are rarely singularly focused. It would be nice though if the primary spokespeople stuck to the core focus.
I agree but political movements are rarely singularly focused. It would be nice though if the primary spokespeople stuck to the core focus.
A lot of nasty agendas there, though. At a rally, a speech about the size of the deficit is a yanwer. A speech about Obama being a secret agent socialist Muslim spy who wants to destroy America is way more fun.
The deficit spending and the implications it brings is what they should stick to. The problem is if they talk the talk they will have to walk the walk when the time comes and as we have seen for some time both parties have been horrid at controlling spending recently.