MontereyVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2007
- Messages
- 6,315
- Likes
- 19
I've honestly been wondering about that one. I haven't said anything because I made a comment a while back that I've tried to stick to - I'm going to try to be more fair to the missile shield.
Is this missile a ballistic missile - and are we talking exoatmospheric intercept? If so, then I'm tempted to take the bet. I would be even more willing to take the bet if their missile involves even basic balloon and chafe countermeasures.
If we go for endoatmospheric intercept of a (unarmed) missile, then I think that we can get it.
Edit: My reason for saying I would be more "fair" is that I can't in good faith say that I KNOW the missile shield will not work. I have serious concerns about the effectiveness of our missile defense when applied in exoatmospheric hit-to-kill scenarios (particularly when countermeasures are involved), but to continually attack something that I have not worked with directly and perhaps do not know all details of is probably unfair...though I will readily admit that the physics they are battling against in these scenarios are daunting.
Geek speak, you're either with it or against it! No gray areas here.
Last edited: