dreVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2011
- Messages
- 3,404
- Likes
- 430
Sure they have caused distractions and accidents.
And if people were lighting up with the kind of prevalence we see with cell phone usage, or if listening to the radio required you to hold it to your head or at least in one hand as you thumb out a message, you'd have a point.
But the point would simply be that those other things should be reconsidered, as well. That we don;t act the way we should in other contexts is a pretty weak argument against a ban of cellphone usage that makes perfect sense.
Going back to the original theme of the thread. We assume a seatbelt law will save lives. How do we know this? It seems like common sense, but truth of the matter is even the most seemingly necessary rules and regulations are probably unnecessary.....have you ever questioned the necessity of traffic lights? Probably not. Guess what? You probably should. Spontaneous order arises when you don't treat people like they are dumb robots. Check out this case study for a town in England that removed all traffic signals, not just lights:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi0meiActlU[/youtube]