You say it like you have disliked the man for some time law.
I don't know him, but evidently you do? Also, no sources for your accusatory post earlier? Ah yes, Mr. Lawgator, how could I have not guessed that?
Just to confuse matters more, my comments were a play on those from LG.
I'm just disappointed LG never came back. He has a penchant for for hit and run posting.
Yes, Russia is doing a fantastic job of invading a sovereign nation when there was absolutely no threat to any other nation and absolutely no precedent, treaty, nor regulation to come anywhere close to justifying the large-scale offensive launched this past week.This whole situation has been handled badly by everyone outside of Russia.
Yes, Russia is doing a fantastic job of invading a sovereign nation when there was absolutely no threat to any other nation and absolutely no precedent, treaty, nor regulation to come anywhere close to justifying the large-scale offensive launched this past week.
Russia is making a power move on the pipeline that runs from the Caspian coast in Azerbaijan through Georgia and ultimately ends in Turkey. You say that you care about energy policy? You might want to go with the guy who is going to keep Russia from gaining a monopoly on Caspian crude oil. Just a thought...
first tactic would be as quickly as possible paint Putin and his cronies as pre-'88 style Soviet commies bent on expansion. The world turns against them quickly if you can make them appear to be regressing to their old form.Like it or not they did it and no one was positioned to stop them. So yes it was handled exceptionally by the Russians mostly for the fact they are going to get what they want.
And I know all about the pipeline, I would like to hear how you think McCain or anyone else outside of Russia plans on stopping them if they wanted it?
I guess we can keep yelling at them? Maybe they will get annoyed and go away?
Actual force most definitely can be applied. While we do not have the troop availability to move in and secure Georgia, we definitely have the technological superiority and could efficiently and effectively destroy their Armor and most of their indirect fire capabilities. That alone would make Putin think twice about engaging in what would devolve into a bloody street-to-street conflict, in which the Georgians have the advantage gained by having superior knowledge of the terrain and of blending into the local populace.The Soviets (yes, on purpose) only back down when actual force can be applied,
Exactly what are Arab terrorist going to do in Georgia? Less than 10% of the country state that they are even affiliated with Islam, even less actually practice. I doubt there would be much sympathy, the kind needed to harbor Middle Eastern Fundamentalists, towards the Fascist Islamic cause.The implications of a wider conflict with Russia with every ME terrorist drooling to take advantage would be overwhelming. I have doubts whether we would get any help from Europe.
Interesting that you are intimidated by Russia to the point of not sending superior fighter and attack jets to knock out military targets. Yet, you would move a very easy to reach Naval Fleet into the Black Sea? Not sure I understand that thinking, one bit.I think something in the order of moving the US Navy into the Black Sea might be a display of force they would consider stepping back from, but we would need Turkey's permission to do that, and it wouldn't hold my breath on that one.
Exactly what are Arab terrorist going to do in Georgia? Less than 10% of the country state that they are even affiliated with Islam, even less actually practice. I doubt there would be much sympathy, the kind needed to harbor Middle Eastern Fundamentalists, towards the Fascist Islamic cause.
Interesting that you are intimidated by Russia to the point of not sending superior fighter and attack jets to knock out military targets. Yet, you would move a very easy to reach Naval Fleet into the Black Sea? Not sure I understand that thinking, one bit.
However, were one to try and pursue that method, I am sure Turkey would oblige, seeing as their control over the pipeline would be severely hampered if Russian troops move close enough to Tbilisi.
Now.. Is there any doubt that the missle shield will be installed?
I would imagine that we would do it just to make them even more mad at this point. But, we surely wouldn't install it to better protect us from Russia - remember, it can't defend against Russian missiles (yeah right).
Believe me, this option is no longer a threat, its going to be built.
We do not need to divert ground troops from Iraq to send in to Georgia. We do not need to send in ground troops at all. We just have to empower the Georgians to fight a guerrilla war against the Russians. They can do this once we have debilitated Russian armor, artillery, and tactical air support capabilities.I'm not talking about the Georgians, I'm referring to the ME, specifically Iraq and Afghanistan. Those two states would be emboldened with a new front opening up. So unless you plan on dropping those two and concentrating on Russia that would make it a three front spread war.
We would fly over Turkey. In March 2003, Turkey's piece of the pipeline was not being threatened by Russia.I never said to send in a fleet, the Navy has some high powered weapons of their own. And you are mistaken if you think we would fly over who.... Iran, Turkey.... northern Russia to hit the Soviets and then return without any kind of reciprocity.
Secure who in Iraq? Russians or Chechans? Also, last time I checked, we were doing a pretty brilliant job, militarily speaking, in Iraq.You want to save the pipeline, you need ground troops to do that, fly byes wont do it. With the whole of Mother Russia sitting within 100 miles you can forget that. Hell we can't even secure the ones in Iraq.
Refer to above statement regarding Turkey in 2003. Also, you make it sound as if Turkey was completely adverse to letting us stage in their country. It was a pretty tight decision made...at the very last second. Give them the threat of Russia and let's see how willing they are to play ball this time around.and don't forget how willing Turkey was to let us go over their territory before the gulf war.
We do not need to divert ground troops from Iraq to send in to Georgia. We do not need to send in ground troops at all. We just have to empower the Georgians to fight a guerrilla war against the Russians. They can do this once we have debilitated Russian armor, artillery, and tactical air support capabilities.
We would fly over Turkey. In March 2003, Turkey's piece of the pipeline was not being threatened by Russia.
Secure who in Iraq? Russians or Chechans? Also, last time I checked, we were doing a pretty brilliant job, militarily speaking, in Iraq.
Refer to above statement regarding Turkey in 2003. Also, you make it sound as if Turkey was completely adverse to letting us stage in their country. It was a pretty tight decision made...at the very last second. Give them the threat of Russia and let's see how willing they are to play ball this time around.
First, in guerrilla warfare, there are no "fronts". Second, even if there were, it would be one continuous front from NW Georgia to NE Georgia. The Georgians would not be fighting on multiple fronts (for arguments sake, using your example, would the Germans have been fighting a four-front war in WWI...???)They would be fighting Russia, Abkhazians and the South Ossetians, they definitely cannot fight a three front war. Once again Russia would strike us back, who and where do you leave open for them to do it?
Turkey consumes seven times the amount of oil they produce. They get most of that oil from the pipeline. Seeing that Russia has targeted the pipeline already, as well as having cut-off select European countries from oil, at times, I would probably side with the pipeline and who is going to assure my continued standard of living.Are you really banking on that. They had plenty of incentive last time and still turned it down. Plus staying out of two world beaters having a fight would be what they choose over some pipeline.
First, in guerrilla warfare, there are no "fronts". Second, even if there were, it would be one continuous front from NW Georgia to NE Georgia. The Georgians would not be fighting on multiple fronts (for arguments sake, using your example, would the Germans have been fighting a four-front war in WWI...???)
Turkey consumes seven times the amount of oil they produce. They get most of that oil from the pipeline. Seeing that Russia has targeted the pipeline already, as well as having cut-off select European countries from oil, at times, I would probably side with the pipeline and who is going to assure my continued standard of living.