Pepe_Silvia
#mikehawk
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 44,480
This is a serious question. If the president has so much control over the market, why didn't Bush do anything about it before he left office?
exactly what did it get you? A post 9-11 period of prosperity followed by a structural problem driven housing market correction. You ended up with money spent in Iraq and Afghanistan and a disastrous prescription drug program for seniors.That's really saying something after the results the last 8 years got us.
and oddly, the market meltdown was basically ushered in by this sweet little congressional majority reversal. Hmmm.the market rallied 10% when the tarp and the no shorting rule was announced under bush. since the stimulus package was announced the market has dropped 25%. that's after it already droped 50%. at these type of levels under any normal circumstances we would have at least seen a bear market rally. we haven't seen it because of obama's policies. plain and simple.
tell me what capital gains there are to tax right now
it's already been announced for the "rich". 15-20%
I'm talking about his pie chart that says how he is going to pay for the megadisaster spending program that he passed. The moron and his cronies didn't bother accounting for the diminished returns in the market due to his programs.Are you talking about his campaign promise or has he actually done something yet?
If he stays below 20% I'll feel a lot better.
I'm talking about his pie chart that says how he is going to pay for the megadisaster spending program that he passed. The moron and his cronies didn't bother accounting for the diminished returns in the market due to his programs.
exactly why it is so idiotic to announce to raise the tax in an environment where we are desperate to encourage and increase investment. he's raising the tax for the sake of "taxing the rich" f-ckers even though a) it will likely not produce much in tax revenue and b) the market is tanking.
Blaming Obama isn't going to keep GM from filing banruptcy or Citi from losing money. I don't see there being a lot he do except try to restore confidence to some degree, but it's the bad economic data that is driving the market down, not really Obama.
Blaming Obama isn't going to keep GM from filing banruptcy or Citi from losing money. I don't see there being a lot he do except try to restore confidence to some degree, but it's the bad economic data that is driving the market down, not really Obama.
would a guy trying to restore confidence send Geithner out to congress to talk about saving the planet amidst a bevy of non-answers. Would he follow that up with a fabricated doomsday speech by the head of the FDIC?Blaming Obama isn't going to keep GM from filing banruptcy or Citi from losing money. I don't see there being a lot he do except try to restore confidence to some degree, but it's the bad economic data that is driving the market down, not really Obama.