Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergarten Right Thing To Do

#76
#76
Can we at least all agree that it is moronic for a Presidential candidate to speak off the cuff about Sex Ed for 5 year olds in front of an audience?

How about a candidate that is for bringing morals and discipline back into our school systems so that way we don't have to worry about teaching 5 year olds about this crap?? Is that impossible or not??
 
#78
#78
Reparations for the transgressions against their quadrouple great grandparent that sucks the tax dollars right out of my hard earned check.

These people still think they are statistics and they can't get out the hood. That's why they kill people because someone's homie jacked the sugar for the kool-aid.
 
#80
#80
How about a candidate that is for bringing morals and discipline back into our school systems so that way we don't have to worry about teaching 5 year olds about this crap?? Is that impossible or not??
So, teaching about sex is immoral? Interesting.
 
#82
#82
These people still think they are statistics and they can't get out the hood. That's why they kill people because someone's homie jacked the sugar for the kool-aid.
Maybe you should take off your hood, along with that white robe you racist SOB. THESE PEOPLE??? HOMIE JACKED THE SUGAR FOR THE KOOL-AID???

You are an idiot.
 
#83
#83
I am smart enough to see the value in teaching children what is appropriate touching in a day and age when children often live almost entirely isolated from everyone but their family when they are not at school. Children play inside much more these days, often have less siblings, and play in much smaller groups. This leads to more opportunity for pedophiles and less opportunity for these children to actually speak about it or for warning signs to appear.


I agree with teaching and knowledge. From prior discussions in other topics back sometime, you should know that. I'm just saying, I have a 4 soon to be 5 year old. The understanding will not be there. It's ludricous. We're still working on thanks, sorry, what does no mean, stop that, eat your dinner. It's my only child. I'm not giving him up to an idiot teacher at 5 years old. Nor will middle school sex-ed take precedent over my teaching. Aid in it, maybe, but I'm number one right now and will keep it that way until it is time to turn him over to himself.
 
#85
#85
Negative, it certainly makes him more attractive to me.

In that case, why don't you go volunteer to the school that you would like to teach 5 year olds about sex and see just how far someone's foot goes up your butt. Saying crap like this is the exact reason Hillary is ahead of him in the first place. There's a place to be bold and doing it before the primaries is not the place.
 
#87
#87
In kindergarten I didn't want to hold a girl's hand. If my teacher had told me I had to do "that" with a girl I would have thrown up.
I'm sure the girl would have had the same reaction at the prospect of doing "that' with you.
 
#88
#88
In that case, why don't you go volunteer to the school that you would like to teach 5 year olds about sex and see just how far someone's foot goes up your butt. Saying crap like this is the exact reason Hillary is ahead of him in the first place. There's a place to be bold and doing it before the primaries is not the place.
:good!:
 
#89
#89
Maybe you should take off your hood, along with that white robe you racist SOB. THESE PEOPLE??? HOMIE JACKED THE SUGAR FOR THE KOOL-AID???

You are an idiot.


I might have to go with you on this one.......

Scary........

:eek:hmy::blink:
 
#90
#90
Maybe you should take off your hood, along with that white robe you racist SOB. THESE PEOPLE??? HOMIE JACKED THE SUGAR FOR THE KOOL-AID???

You are an idiot.
You are going to be bombarded with idiots demanding an apology for implying he is part of their ranks.
 
#91
#91
I definitely don't. However, if the government is going to have schools, I see educating students about sex as a worthwhile venture.

I would rather see our schools teach children the basics of reading, writing, physical education, literature, science, and tradeskills.

I think it's a sad statement that our parents in this country have dropped the ball so much that we expect the schools to do the job of the parents. I am fine with teaching anatomy, hell it is science, but don't teach 5 year olds sex education. Is sex education really working anyway, with teen pregnancy much more common now than it was 30 years ago?
 
#93
#93
I definitely don't. However, if the government is going to have schools, I see educating students about sex as a worthwhile venture.

I would think that ranks pretty low on your list of issues that sway you to vote for a president. So I will stand by the thought that this gets nothing for him.
 
#94
#94
So, teaching about sex is immoral? Interesting.


No, having a government fostered environment where you can't offend anyone but chrisitians has led to enough moral decay in our society that it actually becomes a thought to need to teach 5 year olds sex-ed. That's immoral. And those same liberal idiots are going to propose methods to teach my 5 year old morals. Idiots.
 
#95
#95
I have a 4 and 7 year old. All I know is if they showed up at school and sex was the topic of the day, we would be on our way back home. My kids have know about "improper touching" since they were 3 and thats really all they need to know at that age.
 
#96
#96
Maybe you should take off your hood, along with that white robe you racist SOB. THESE PEOPLE??? HOMIE JACKED THE SUGAR FOR THE KOOL-AID???

You are an idiot.

Your entitled to you opinion of me. Do you actually know why people are killed in predominately black urban areas?? They kill based on clothing color, hand signs, tattoos, and other STUPID reasons. You can call me racist if you want too, but next time before you just on that ship you might want to understand what I say instead of trying to twist it. Big difference in before sarcastic and naive. Also where did I mention that I don't like people of other races??? You draw a line that long and curvy my friend.
 
#98
#98
I'm not great at explaining myself but... I didn't even think about girls until around 4th or 5th grade and not sexually until 6th or 7th when I became enlightened thanks to the back of the school bus and a friends' dad's playboys :)

We had a sex course and video when I was in 5th grade that parents could keep their kids from viewing. My parents didn't let me watch it.

IMO opening these small children up to adult issues is totally insane. It's NOT going to help anything. If anything it is going to make them more curious about the opposite sex. That's all those videos did for me and my friends. In middle school, once my parents let me watch the video, all we did was wonder what the "clean" girls looked like; making us more curious. Those classes DO NOT HELP!

Can anyone argue with the fact that there is no such thing as safe sex? The only way to protect one's self is abstenece.

If we really wanted to fix many of our problems related to this topic we would teach abstenence instead of this safe sex garbage.

Obviously most people won't wait but why not teach that this is THE ONLY way to truely protect one's self. The reason is people view it as regulating morality because it comes from the Bible.

It's not about judging people, because I've too many flaws to even talk about, it's common sense.
 
I have a 4 and 7 year old. All I know is if they showed up at school and sex was the topic of the day, we would be on our way back home. My kids have know about "improper touching" since they were 3 and thats really all they need to know at that age.
Well, if you have read the article along with what has come out of the Obama camp then you would understand that it is pretty much about teaching them what is appropriate and inappropriate touching.

People on this board are making the leap from that to apparently teacher or student demonstrated acts of sex in kindergarten...
 

VN Store



Back
Top