Yes and no. I didn't see as much partisan politics there and the truth of the matter. I've said for years the numbers of the F-35 they wanted to buy was a pipe dream and the Air Force, USMC and USN should have been thinking high tech/low tech for the force structure. The legacy designs like the Teen series, B-52 and A-10 are being used heavily because you don't need 5th Gen stealth in the skies over Afghanistan or Iraq. You do need a single purpose, task oriented aircraft that's going to do a job well and at low cost.
The F-35 got shoved up the backsides of the whole world as the be all-do all fighter that was going to save democracy before 11 AM and make them a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch. It's an amazing machine, but it was never going to be able to replace (relatively) low tech that's needed for a lot of the fights we get into.
You want to see USAF stupidity in it's prime? Read up on
the LA/AR Program. Perfect example of actually having a mature, off the shelf aircraft at a cheap cost performing the missions that were needed. And with the way newer, smaller munitions (though no less deadly) were coming along, would be even more potent in fights we could use them in.