volatil
Villains
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 42,084
- Likes
- 100,404
You can disagree, but unless you have a source within HR at a state run university, more specifically at UT to provide for a direct rebuttal .......... We will have to agree to disagree.
As soon as I brought it up to my wife I buckled down for what I knew would be a LONG answer, and it was. I just provided a shortened version of the long answer. ID rather be poked in the eye than listen to an HR answer normally btw.
You can believe what you want, but I am confident in what I provided the board.
You can disagree, but unless you have a source within HR at a state run university, more specifically at UT to provide for a direct rebuttal .......... We will have to agree to disagree.
As soon as I brought it up to my wife I buckled down for what I knew would be a LONG answer, and it was. I just provided a shortened version of the long answer. ID rather be poked in the eye than listen to an HR answer normally btw.
You can believe what you want, but I am confident in what I provided the board.
My opinion is the time the job must be posted before filling is the only flexible part of the process. Three interviews must be conducted no matter what but they can be done on the phone. So that shouldn't matter.
Is the job posted by the university yet??
I would think the Hart Presser on Sunday terminating the employment of Derek Dooley would suffice as a job opening.
Good morning Grudenites. I read several pages from last night and thought I could provide some clarification of HR guidelines at a state run institution. My wife is second in charge in HR at a state run institution.
She says the athletic department plays by a different set of rules typically. One that would allow a direct hire without normal interviewing and even posting procedures. (I.E Dooley when Kiffin bolted)
In short, UT can hire who they want, how they want, when they want, in this specific case. Hope this helps.
Oh, and Happy Thanksgiving to all!
I would think the Hart Presser on Sunday terminating the employment of Derek Dooley would suffice as a job opening.
I tried to ask this question last night but was rebuffed.
I agree that this does not add up. I would never say SBV was not a an accurate poster...but this is just not correct unless there is something about the Dooley hire that would allow for an early hire??
After reading this post I believe there is a possibility that SBV may be correct.
There is No Law that requires them to post this job..SBV in answer to a question about it said.. he was trying to calm people down because there would be other coaches interviewed not named Gruden. He also said that there is a processs that the AD is going to follow.
My thinking is......This process may be self imposeed by the AD office but not required by law.