Godfatha
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
- Messages
- 11,671
- Likes
- 13,884
No offense carter, because I have appreciated your info and stance from the get-go, but I have a question.
If I were a bazillionaire trying to keep things quiet, I dont think I would use a UT sponsored legal team to draft such an agreement. This may be why your people are out of sync.
I would go with someone I hold a little closer to heart given the amount of money I am ponying up. So the question is, Would it be possible to have a MOU in place, not sanctioned by UT, that would serve as a placeholder until an official UT represented form is completed when the appropriate time comes?
Im thinking business transaction vs. UTAD transaction at this point.
What do you say? Or am I full on 'tard?![]()
And if I am a lawyer am I going to go spout off to my buddy that I know good and well will blab it on The biggest UT message board where he can be easily traced to me? Not if I like my job.
Not to mention that something like this is probably handled completely by the Senior partners of the firm No underlings would be privy. No offense Carter.
my general manager has 14 season tickets. 4 in the front row, 35 yardline behind the home bench, 4 on the second row directly behind them. Four on the 50 25 rows up on the away side and two on the 20 yardline front row upper deck and he couldn't give them away. He himself is refusing to go until dooley is gone. Such a sad state for our program to be in
When all is said and done IF there is an agreement to be reached with Gruden the base will be no more than 4.5-5m with the rest coming from incentives like bowl games, SECCG, and BCS bowls, etc...
When you think of VFL I mean real Vol For life what names pop in your head
1. Bill Battle
2. Bob (Robert) Neyland
3. Johnny Majors
4. Peyton Manning
5. Phillip Fulmer
6. Doug Dickey
No offense carter, because I have appreciated your info and stance from the get-go, but I have a question.
If I were a bazillionaire trying to keep things quiet, I dont think I would use a UT sponsored legal team to draft such an agreement. This may be why your people are out of sync.
I would go with someone I hold a little closer to heart given the amount of money I am ponying up. So the question is, Would it be possible to have a MOU in place, not sanctioned by UT, that would serve as a placeholder until an official UT represented form is completed when the appropriate time comes?
Im thinking business transaction vs. UTAD transaction at this point.
What do you say? Or am I full on 'tard?![]()
Is it correct to assume that the files of the the UT legal team will become public record if Gruden is hired? If so, then a freedom of information request would undercover that UT had actually negotiated with Gruden prior to firing Dooley. So maybe a booster had one of his lawyers prepare a MOU that could be signed now and then replaced at a date after Dooley is fired.