smokeyhuntsgators
The Good Witch Of Volnation
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,475
- Likes
- 37,355
I'll add them to the list then and change the OG term since nobody can agree on who an OG is anymore.
Anyone know their stances?
Credible Poster Status Update
????
SBV
Jay
Lexvol
Cd12
Beechervol
Anti-Grude
bcarter
Wait and See
slice
Boro -(optimistic)
ALL GRUDE
Yay4Bray
Babyvol
OCI
OldVol
Just curious, please don't read too much into it...
If Jimbo Fisher is announced as the HC (not saying he will be) what is your initial concerns and why? Besides the fact you all have a Grude-on for Jon Gruden.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
I think what most people are seeing is, like all of the other signs in the search, Hargis left the door open by simply, and quite frankly, skeptically quoting a source that disagreed with him.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Lex is all Grude.
Here is what I cannot reconcile (other than the lack of public denial from Hart or Gruden himself):
Three different people have said that Hart met with local law enforcement in regards to security for whenever the hire is announced. That was confirmed by different people with friends in law enforcement on this board.
How many candidates that we are supposedly interviewing require "security".
Flame away.
Sure he left it open. I leave the possibility open but he certainly didn't say in that article his source was wrong, His hard line stance was standing behind his first article