SGMVols
Sophomoric Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 26,934
- Likes
- 20,818
Having players who can create their own space off the dribble and make shots is pure talent, we have one maybe two players who can take ppl off the dribble and these teams in the final 4 have several plus consistent front court play. That is the difference. When we played UNC to start the year Love and Davis were erratic and turnover prone now they are both playing like Kennedy Chandler, the difference is they have Armando Bacot and Brady Manek to pass to.Damn, blue bloods make it in the end. It's hard understanding what makes these teams consistently get this far in the tournament. I guess in the end size, athleticism and recruiting stars do matter when the pressure is turned up.
1. Maybe if they made it more convenient for the younger fan to watch then more would.Weird on two fronts: 1) your statement does not match NFL rating demographics to the degree to draw your erroneous conclusion and 2) your ageism bigotry is disgusting.
Kansas had the easiest draw to the Final Four that I can recall in recent memory. They got treated as if they were the #1 overall seed. As soon as the bracket came out they were a no brainer to make it there.UK gets knocked out in the first round after pounding two teams that end up making the final four. Hell, we even played Duke pretty well way back at the start of the year.
I would say a big part of that was due to all the SEC and Big 10 masons throwing up brick after brick. That’s why they’re all watching the Final Four from the comfort of their living rooms.