05_never_again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 24,474
- Likes
- 22,383
I think it would be though. There are contending teams who would trade multiple prospects (not draft picks, but prospects) for Forsberg. He's cheap relative to how good he is and would be under contract during the 2021-22 season as well, so not just a rental. He's really the only guy we've got that I think would yield the return that a lot of fans want.Johansen & Duchene will be left unprotected for the expansion draft.
Granlund and Haula are cheap rentals for a contender. They'll be moved but we won't get more than draft picks.
Unless we could get Josi to remove his NMC, Ekholm will be left unprotected for the expansion draft so he'll traded prior and he should bring a very nice return.
I just can't see us moving Forsberg. The return would have to be HUGE.
The issue with trading Forsberg is that it would be really, really unpopular among the fans, even if the return was considerable. There would be a ton of "why did we trade Forsberg and not Johansen/Duchene/Ellis/etc." talk because most fans don't understand or know about contracts.
Outside of Forsberg and Josi, the only current player that would yield a nice return is Ekholm. Everybody else is just a rental for a contender (Granlund and Haula like you mentioned) or un-moveable because of the contract + age. I wonder what the interest in Arvidsson might be; he's under contract for 4 more years, but it is more manageable than some other guys ($4.25m/year) and he's only 27. I also wonder if his hard-charging style and lack of size might have caused him to lose a step.