I really hope we can keep Josi locked down long term. I like his game a lot.
What do y'all think the chances are that we let suter walk after this year, assuming we re-sign rads?
And if we don't sign rads again will we retain suter?
Radulov's contract (an ELC) is up after this season; it was treated as being suspended for the 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11 seasons. Nashville had the option of walking away, which would have made him a UFA, but also knocked his contract off the 50-contract limit.
Columbus had exactly the same situation with Alexander Svitov, who had signed an extension and then bolted to the KHL two weeks later. Eventually, Columbus got tired of waiting around and voided the contract, so Svitov is a UFA who has no NHL contract and whose rights are owned by no one.
Part of Radulov being "allowed" to come back to North America was based on him promising to go back overseas after this season is over. His contract here expires June 30 and he's free to open negotiations and re-up at any time, and this could be very interesting. The Russians don't have any legal or ethical leg to stand on; they've been pulling this garbage for as long as I can remember. If a player wanted to come to North America, he was conscripted before he could (Svitov, Chistov, Zherdev, etc.). If he wanted to train in Russia during the offseason, they'd lock the doors on the facilities so he couldn't, then try to prevent him from leaving entirely. They complained about "unfair compensation" for players going to the NHL, despite there being both a transfer agreement and very clear Russian labor law. Then they simply refused to negotiate a new transfer agreement, but talked about "honoring contracts" while trying to sneak guys like Svitov and Radulov out the back door.
Obviously, I don't have any love for the Russian federation or their power brokers. I think they're dishonorable and, in some cases, outright criminal corrupt blowhards who need to pull their heads out of their asses and realize that the Cold War is over.
That was worse than what Weber did IMO. Was it even called?
It was called a minor penalty I believe.
It was called as slashing, which it quite clearly was not. Yes, you can be penalized for slashing at an opponent and missing, but the motions and setups are entirely different.
To me, this was another case of influencing a game by trying not to influence it too much. Schenn got called for charging when Asham got the match penalty, but the referee didn't put his arm up until after Asham got the cross-check in (two full seconds later). There was an interference call here, but something that was quite clearly a spear was called a slash, so it was coincidental minors.
It's crap. Yes, it's "always been that way", but it sure as hell doesn't make it right.